Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PWeeHurman/Archive

Report date July 16 2009, 00:37 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by PMDrive1061


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:44, 16 July 2009 (UTC) Yet another idiot has returned, namely the "Pee-Wee Herman" vandal. I'm locking out the article and my talk page as well. I swing by for a moment and I see this jackass on my talk page. PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:37, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * I am assuming you are wanting to have a CheckUser ran, if so could you please add the RFCU template? Otherwise, there is really no reason for you to have opened this case as really all you are doing is feeding the trolls here with your ranting and name calling. Tiptoety  talk 00:40, 16 July 2009 (UTC)


 * With all of the agony this individual has put me through, calling him a jackass is mild, believe me. I don't place any templates on the talk pages of the socks per WP:DENY, but I think I'm entitled to express some frustration and anger once in awhile.  Yes, I'd like an checkuser to check for hidden socks.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:44, 16 July 2009 (UTC)


 * - To check for sleepers. Tiptoety  talk 00:52, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Really.  I realize lashing out at some nameless, faceless adolescent hiding behind a computer is futile, but things like this sometimes get the best of me.  He and his ilk have been away for a fairly long time (I'm positive it's a coordinated offsite attack), so if there are any further attacks, I'll just do what I always did and deny them any more satisfaction.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:57, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: This charming username just showed up.  One and the same? --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:59, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * No obvious sleepers. Short rangeblocks could be possible in the event this continues. – Luna Santin  (talk) 05:37, 16 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
I have become greatly fed up with this ED idiot and his merry band of equally idiotic, pimple-pussed adolescents screwing up my talk page. Where one of these little idiots lies, others are sure to be lurking. BTW, I would appreciate a CU on this as well since I am going to file a complaint with the IP for a TOS violation. This has to stop. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PMDrive1061 (talk • contribs)

. Luna Santin mentioned in the last case that a rangeblock might be possible if this continued. And please, if you're asking for a checkuser, please file a case with the option "checkuser requested", otherwise CheckUsers might not see it. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 12:21, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Note: I just got clobbered by User:WeeHermanPee. Damn these idiots, anyway. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:59, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets




Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * Blocked, tagged and . Brandon (talk) 05:35, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by PMDrive1061
Just when I thought this guy and his merry band had dispersed, along comes yet another idiot to disrupt my talk page. Whenever one of these things pops up, others follow.

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
FWIW, the account has already been blocked. I agree that a sweep would be a good idea though. TN X Man 11:55, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

self endorsing for a sleeper check and an IP block, if possible. Noting that this is in relation to  and Co. (but is almost definitely the same user, based upon the behavioural evidence, and the username) SpitfireTally-ho! 23:40, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

✅ that the following users are the same: They're both blocked and no further sleepers were found upon checking CodFarley so no action is required, but I thought you might like to know that. --Deskana (talk) 22:00, 8 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks Deskana. I've tagged the acocunts as socks of SpitfireTally-ho! 22:05, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:39, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

This has become more than chronic and I'm greatly sick and tired of this idiot and his idiot friends screwing up my talk page and that of other users. It is more than time for a major rangeblock and possible formal action.

Since this sock has already been ✅ by CU, I am going to notify the CU that performed the check for further action. Auntie E. (talk) 01:00, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Much obliged.  :)  PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:44, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

21 June 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Same naming schema as the rest of the socks Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_PWeeHurman and, same editing behavior. Requesting CU as he usually does a few at a time. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 15:58, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.
 * J'onn J'onzz has posted a note to his talk page disavowing being a sock and saying his name came from a comic book character and noting that his account is four years old (something I admit, I did not notice in my initial report) I think it best to confirm via CU one way, but this one may be a misidentification from his name just being way too close. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 00:37, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments by other users

Requested by -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 15:58, 21 June 2010 (UTC) Let's see what else comes up. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 22:40, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

Account blocked. TN X Man 20:41, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * And unblocked. ❌. --jpgordon:==( o ) 03:05, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I removed the tag and will now close. -- B s a d o w s k i 1   03:09, 22 June 2010 (UTC)