Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/P dump/Archive

Evidence submitted by Singularity42
P dump created Battlefront3.net. It was speedy deleted. P dump immediately re-created the article with the SP tag still on the article, and gave an explanation at the talk page. The IP then comes along and removes the SD tag, giving an unspoken inference in the edit summary that they are a different person thant P dump.

The only editor other than the IP to edit Battlefront3.net is P dump (other than editors tagging the article). The IP's only edits have been the same articles that P dump has edited. Singularity42 (talk) 00:16, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

CheckUser requests
Requested by Singularity42 (talk) 00:16, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Enough evidence to justify a CheckUser, but I'm not sure there's enough evidence to block without a CheckUser. Singularity42 (talk) 00:16, 28 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Based on this edit, it is now obvious that the IP is the editor while logged off. Therefore, I am rescinding my CheckUser request. Provided the editor agrees to refrain from editing the same articles/subject areas from both his account and IP address at the same time, I no longer think a block is required. Since I may be in a bit of a dispute with the editor over whether his article should be deleted or not, this might be better from someone uninvolved. Thanks. Singularity42 (talk) 01:23, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

per filer's request. –MuZemike 20:16, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Conclusions
No action taken at this time. Let myself or another admin know if the disruption via both account and IP resume. –MuZemike 22:32, 28 December 2009 (UTC)