Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pagolding/Archive

29 July 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Both of these accounts are focused on editing two primary articles Digital estate planning and Digital Legacy. The sequential editing times on both articles also strongly suggest the operation of a sock/meat on these articles. See:  and  ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 21:26, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I have changed the link for the Digital legacy history above, after I moved that page from Digital Legacy. —C.Fred (talk) 11:54, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Yes, there appears to be overlap in the two editors' edits, but if it is the same user, how is this situation abusive? Neither user has so much as a welcome message as I write this, much less any conduct warnings (or notice of this investigation!). —C.Fred (talk) 11:56, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I am not sure why Twinkle didn't issue the standard notice that it usually does.  I've gone ahead and sent direct notice to both accounts.  ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:08, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * In terms of behaviour, this diff has added a link to a spammy site promoting the same topic in the external links section. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:12, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Pagolding is the older account, so I've moved this case to show that. And I've blocked and tagged Markyparky2 per WP:DUCK. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:23, 3 August 2011 (UTC)