Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pajko123/Archive

24 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Ducky: same name, same behavior (accounts devoted exclusively to stalking me - Pajko1 was blocked before he could try it). These are already blocked; I'm really filing this for the purpose of getting a CU to check for other ones, if that's allowed. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 05:13, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Yeah, let's take a look. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 05:19, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅. Didn't find any others, no interesting changes to check. --jpgordon:==( o ) 15:37, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Righto, we're done then. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 16:03, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

24 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I guess the words "obvious sockpuppet is obvious" are all that are needed here, really. LikeLakers2 (talk &#124; Sign my guestbook!) 23:40, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅. User blocked. LikeLakers2 (talk &#124; Sign my guestbook!) 23:47, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I know i'm editing an archive, but the above is a CU tag, and although it does indeed look confirmed, the user is not a Checkuser and does not have access to the relevant data to make that call. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  01:07, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

25 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

QUACK. As before, this one has already been blocked, but perhaps CU will dredge up a couple more, or help us decide if a rangeblock is feasible. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 00:21, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Ack, I didn't realize LikeLakers had already gone through the whole SPI process - I thought the new one had been blocked without process as too obvious to need an SPI. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 00:26, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Nothing else there. –MuZemike 00:25, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

27 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:DUCK. This one isn't blocked yet has now been blocked too. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 04:23, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * You can thank the best vandal-fighting admin around for the block. I'm going to go ahead and tag it as a "confirmed" sock per WP:DUCK; because CU doesn't really need to be bothered on this one, though I'd guess it's probably a very "similar" IP... Doc   talk  05:16, 27 September 2011 (UTC)