Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pallikanti/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Both overlap heavily at Banta and both seem to be doing self-promotional edits such as and. Also both have created Draft:Pallikanti Rohith at separate times and both have required WP:G11. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:15, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This seems obvious enough to not require CU attention. . Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:45, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I ran a check, see my note in the report below. Girth Summit  (blether)  18:22, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:DUCK; exactly the same content as before, see. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:35, 18 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment - added GeethaGod due to spamming at Banta. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:05, 19 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment - added LightYear.XX.XX.XXXX due to spamming at Draft:Pallikanti Rohith. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:23, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked LightYear.XX.XX.XXXX.
 * -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 21:25, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Blocked the other two. Less convincing than the the first one, so please verify. -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 21:31, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Stumbled i here from CAT:CSD. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 21:32, 20 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Went ahead and tagged my prey. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 21:35, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * So, all of the accounts in this report and the previous one are confirmed to each other, with the exception of, and with the addition of:
 * Looking into ShakerAditya now... Girth Summit  (blether)  18:15, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * So, ShakerAditya is operating out of a different IP range from the other accounts, which geolocates to the same city. Behavioural evaluation would be needed; I'm happy to trust 's judgment if he's looked closely at the editing. Girth Summit  (blether)  18:21, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * ShakerAditya was adding the same promo as the other accounts, so the behavioural link is clear. They're already blocked and tagged, so there's nothing more to do - closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 13:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * ShakerAditya was adding the same promo as the other accounts, so the behavioural link is clear. They're already blocked and tagged, so there's nothing more to do - closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 13:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets


Is a WP:DUCK because of Draft:PALLIKANTI ROHITH. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:31, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Yep... compare the politics and quotes sections of Draft:PALLIKANTI ROHITH with . French speakers will also note some 'clever' wordplay. - please indef the sock. Thanks,  Spicy (talk) 23:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
 * , closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:52, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
More Pallikanti Rohith spam at Banta. Again, making false claims that he is the 'ambassador' of the drink and linking to the same sources that don't support the claim. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:24, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Seems obvious enough to me, this from Resoning vs this and other contribs of the master. firefly  ( t · c ) 11:11, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Closing - should've closed first time around as there's nothing left to do. firefly  ( t · c ) 12:56, 12 March 2022 (UTC)