Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Papa Smooch/Archive

13 April 2011

 * Note: Originally opened at Sockpuppet investigations/Jasper Deng


 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

became suspicious to me after his first non-userspace edit was to Requests for adminship/RHM22 (here). Here, Zombie Douche comments by starting with "Comment:" (notice the colon), and does not have a space between the end of his post and his signature, just like does (example). There is one problem with the two being the same person, which is 18:51 UTC on April 13, in which three edits by both accounts are made. Here, Jasper Deng !votes oppose at BuickCenturyDriver's RfA. A mere seven minutes later, Zombie Douche !votes neutral at BCD's RfA. The first thing Zombie Douche comments on is BCD's "clean" blocklog, while Jasper Deng's first comment in his !vote is on BCD's unclean blocklog. A mere three minutes later, Jasper replies to Zombie Douche, correcting him that BCD's blocklog is not clean. What I see here in this exchange is sort of a good-hand account/bad-hand account maneuver. Zombie Douche makes a clear mistake that may have been intentional in order for Jasper to look good with his correction. "User has never been blocked" seems like a suspicious thing to say if it is a mistake made on purpose, especially being it is the first sentence for the explanation of the !vote. It says on Zombie Douche's userpage that he is a recent changes and new page patroller, and judging by Jasper's contributions, he, too, is a recent changes patroller. On Zombie Douche's talk page, he comments that "If you think that's shocking, then you'll really find it shocking that I know of the RFA reform." Twenty-seven minutes later, Jasper !votes at the RfA Reform page here.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  20:25, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * In no way am I affiliated with this user. Personally, I would never choose that username in the first place. You can do CheckUser and find nothing. I really do not get involved in RfAs, and, in addition, have started several SPIs myself.Jasper Deng (talk) 20:30, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * This kind of discussion is avoided by me - I have stopped lots of it on WQA.Jasper Deng (talk) 20:33, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * So overall, I am not guilty of socking. A CheckUser will show it.Jasper Deng (talk) 20:34, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Seem more likely that this is someone torqued at Jasper rather than Jasper himself. Any ideas who it might be?&mdash;Kww(talk) 20:32, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Both users sign their comments directly at the end, without a space. The evidence is interesting, but my experiences in the past with Jasper have only been positive, so I have a hard time believing that they would harass me on my talk page. I have a much easier time believing that it's a troll torqued at Jasper, but I've no clue who it might be.  Swarm   X 20:43, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Just out of curiosity, what is torquing?Jasper Deng (talk) 20:46, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ the following are the same:
 * appears ❌ to these accounts. TN X Man  20:36, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Tagged and blocked. May I suggest that a clerk move this to WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Papa Smooth? That's the original account.&mdash;Kww(talk) 20:43, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * You mean WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Papa Smooch?Jasper Deng (talk) 20:45, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note:Done by another user.Jasper Deng (talk) 20:54, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Tagged and blocked. May I suggest that a clerk move this to WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Papa Smooth? That's the original account.&mdash;Kww(talk) 20:43, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * You mean WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Papa Smooch?Jasper Deng (talk) 20:45, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note:Done by another user.Jasper Deng (talk) 20:54, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

08 March 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Like the other sock,, this user made their first edits to an RfA-related field. Jasper Deng (talk) 03:36, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * This sock has since gone on to trolling, and I've reported to AIV, but it should be checked nonetheless.Jasper Deng (talk) 04:05, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Endorsing for confirmation and sleepers. Most new accounts don't start off by accusing Malleus, and they certainly do seem fixated on Pol430's RFA. (Feather also edited there). —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 04:04, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Um, what am I missing here? has made zero edits to an "RfA-related" area, and  is already blocked as a sock of . Where is the evidence, diffs, etc?  Tiptoety  talk 07:22, 8 March 2012 (UTC)


 * HA's comment was 04:04, 8 March 2012, J.delanoy's block was 04:59, March 8, 2012. There was a time difference and J.delanoy did not comment here. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  15:14, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Right, but I am still not sure how plays into all this.  Tiptoety  talk 17:47, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Fusional looks like Feathers Trial who's confirmed to be a sock of Barackbush.Jasper Deng (talk) 17:57, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm going to archive this under Sockpuppet investigations/Papa Smooch's case. Please note that this case was originally opened at Sockpuppet investigations/Barackbush. SpitfireTally-ho! 20:22, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

22 April 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Brand new user appeared to oppose at Dennis Brown's RFA, then posts on Dennis's talkpage telling him to withdraw the RFA. CU confirms it's User:Barackbush, User:Feathers Trial and User:Jimmy of Wales. No sleepers or other socks on that IP. Elen of the Roads (talk) 00:28, 22 April 2012 (UTC)