Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PapazaTaklaAttıranİmam/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The new account does have similar habit/behavior like blocked user PapazaTaklaAttıranİmam. Both account are very similar to a sockmaster named User:Joohnny braavoo1; see Sockpuppet investigations/Joohnny braavoo1. They all may be related due to their similar nationalistic agenda/quest/disruption. Wario-Man (talk) 12:09, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Ashina tribe: Sockmaster Sock
 * Ghurid dynasty: Sockmaster claimed "Ghurids were Turks" Sock's edits on the main article
 * Safavid dynasty Sockmaster Sock
 * Asen dynasty Sockmaster's claim (mentioned Asen) Sock's edit on the main article

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The best CU can say about these two accounts is that they are to each other, bordering unlikely. The two accounts are ❌ to, a non-stale confirmed Joohnny braavoo1 sock. With that being said, I think Şappur Şuppur passes the WP:DUCK test with respect to PapazaTaklaAttıranİmam based on the almost identical diffs presented. . I am less convinced about the potential connection to Joohnny braavoo1; Joohnny appears capable of using well-formed citations , whereas PapazaTaklaAttıranİmam just pastes bare Google Books URLs to cite books . Especially given the CU data, I'd say this is someone else. Mz7 (talk) 20:02, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.


 * Similar removals: sock1 sock2
 * Similar targeted articles: sock1 blocked sock
 * And this rant is very similar to sockmasters' comments on talk pages. Wario-Man (talk) 19:33, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Patlat Gitsin is ✅ to
 * Tarakoda is . Same range, different device and it's not a mobile vs. desktop issue in case any clerk was wondering.
 * Confirmed account is . on the other. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:32, 19 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Just noting that the tags for this case need to be corrected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:32, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , yeah, I didn't want to confirm to the master because I can't directly link to them, but it is as confirmed as the come to the suspected sock blocked last time. I'm not particularly good at the case naming and tagging stuff, so I'm fine with whatever you and think is best. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:34, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Closing, let's just leave the tags as they are. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:20, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The edits and removals on Khalaj people are identical to previous blocked socks; vs. blocked socks'  Also uses similar citation formatting and writes similar WP:BATTLEGROUND comments. Wario-Man (talk) 12:59, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ to Patlat Gitsin above. Blocked w/o tags; I don't particularly care if it's tagged like did above or tagged to the master or left untagged. Same dude, though. Katietalk 19:41, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Nothing more to do. Closing. Cabayi (talk) 06:44, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:DUCK. Similar comments on Talk:List of Turkic dynasties and countries: Sockmaster New account Wario-Man (talk) 19:44, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ., closing. Mz7 (talk) 01:25, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Looks like a WP:DUCK because the edits are very similar to another sockpuppet of this sockmaster. Compare new sp, new sp. Also both new accounts. Blocked account Firatlal wrote very similar comments on the talk page too. Wario-Man (talk) 07:06, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Same country, but different geolocations. The user agents are all different too. This is going to need a behavioral investigation. That's all I can give you, unfortunately...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Two out of the three accounts indefed, and the other one only edited once in January and never again. Closing. Sro23 (talk) 01:49, 14 March 2021 (UTC)