Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PasqualeGiliberti/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The 3 of them have done several edits on the topic of the probably unnotable Davide Giliberti - his article, the WP:AFD discussion for his article, listing him in a list, trying to edit the userpage and talk page of a user by this name and reporting the failure - and nothing else. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:10, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

You may want to add this said other user,. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:11, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Added three further users who have also been SPAs on the article and the AFD discussion. Bearcat (talk) 16:44, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I couldn't find a link to the AFD in this investigation, so here it is Articles for deletion/Davide Giliberti. Gamebuster19901 (Talk║Contributions) 17:12, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Added another user which edited the page. Gamebuster19901 (Talk║Contributions) 17:20, 7 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The behavioral evidence among the single-purpose accounts at Articles for deletion/Davide Giliberti is compelling, but I've requested CheckUser to verify and check for potential sleeper accounts. Mz7 (talk) 17:42, 7 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Note: the article and deletion discussion had to be protected to prevent disruptive sock/meatpuppet editing . Gamebuster19901 (Talk║Contributions) 05:05, 8 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Non-clerk comment I'm not seeing any relationship either, these ones are all formatted like "firstname lastname", the others aren't. Gamebuster19901 (Talk║Contributions) 18:02, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
See Sockpuppet investigations/Yicaichina.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:02, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * What link are you suggesting between these two situations? I'm certainly not seeing any obvious one. Bearcat (talk) 06:20, 9 March 2017 (UTC)


 * you've left here and in Sockpuppet investigations/Yicaichina a "see" note without details, please let me know if there is anything more to look at. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  14:48, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Collapsing per . ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  15:12, 10 March 2017 (UTC)


 * I blocked all named accounts on behavioral evidence alone, in addition to . There's no need for CU here, in my opinion. Ignoring the IP, as it's gone inactive. ~ Rob 13 Talk 18:51, 9 March 2017 (UTC)