Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Peppypoach/Archive

19 January 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

A duck if I've ever seen one; most edits are the addition of templates, with a particular love for multipleissues. As soon as another user asked if Peppypoach had other accounts, he/she "resigned". Dunno whose sock it is but I think it's worth looking under a rock or two, or maybe somebody at SPI will recognize this user's MO. Father Goose (talk) 05:23, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Barring evidence that their behavior violated policy or was disruptive, there is insufficient evidence to justify running a CheckUser. I see no reason to purse this further. Tiptoety  talk 18:32, 20 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Agreed. This may be someone's sockpuppet, but without specific evidence, there's nothing to be done, so I'm closing the case. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:48, 21 January 2015 (UTC)