Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Perfect Red Cube/Archive

24 February 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Account has only been around a month, likely not the users only account, Madrobotanist turned up with first edits about an article CSD'ed that Perfect Red Cube created, the IP (and others) on Religion in Sweden and Ica stones are warring over content. I have requested CU as there could well be other accounts or sleepers.  LGA talk  edits   06:20, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Do you have some sort of weird obsession with me? Your evidence for this is that some guy made a page of a television show that's about to debut. You're ridiculous. Perfect Red Cube (talk) 06:42, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, well I had more but as per WP:BEANS I was not going to give you a "How to" guide was I.  LGA talk  edits   22:59, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Perfect Red Cube is clearly a reincarnation of a previously blocked IP, who was edit warring from a proxy server. See the history of Religion in Sweden for evidence, specifically the following edits: Red Cube, current IP, former IP. Since this began with proxies from the get go, this is probably not someone new. Requesting checkuser to see if any other connections can be made. Someguy1221 (talk) 10:11, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * added Scotch1888 per creation of frivolous retaliatory SPI case filed against LGA. SpitfireTally-ho! 22:05, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * User:Scotch1888 was blocked in accordance with the above. -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 23:02, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Perfect Red Cube has no immediate sleepers, Scotch1888 is because of proxy (now blocked) usage. Madrobotanist is ❌. . --  DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  05:05, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Closing. Scotch1888 is already blocked, so whether it's a sock of this particular user or not is inconclusive. I mean, it's obviously a sock, but we can't guarantee that it's a sock of this particular user. Leaving the unrelated user as unblocked. Rschen7754 08:52, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

03 November 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Obvious case of WP:DUCK, from the name to the article interests. So obvious I'm asking for a sleeper check. Dougweller (talk) 16:13, 3 November 2013 (UTC) Dougweller (talk) 16:13, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Note interest in Religion in Sweden and Talk:Religion in Sweden. Rschen7754 19:37, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The users, , , , and  are now blocked as ✅. I've also tagged them. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 19:57, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Closing. Rschen7754 19:58, 3 November 2013 (UTC)