Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Personperson1234567/Archive

Evidence submitted by SlamDiego
Note that these are single-purpose accounts and that ReversePorkies essentially restored the most recent version from Personperson1234567 in the context of Personperson1234567 being blocked. — SlamDiego  &#8592;T 02:55, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Edits by Personperson1234567
 * Edits by CoolioDroolio
 * Edits from 70.162.21.165
 * Edits by ReversePorkies
 * ReversePorkies claims to be a friend of Personperson1234567.

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

CheckUser requests
Requested by SlamDiego  &#8592;T 02:55, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

With block evasion. — SlamDiego  &#8592;T 03:19, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

– clear behavioral evidence indicates socking. No CU necessary. MuZemike 18:58, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Conclusions
All registered accounts indefinitely blocked and tagged (i.e. those who already had a temporary block have been extended to indefinite). This quacks more as socking than meatpuppetry in my opinion. MuZemike 19:12, 6 December 2009 (UTC)