Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pestcamel44/Archive

23 March 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

After Wattrider33776 was reverted on this edit the other two accounts created a few days apart restore the same edit. Dinesjars Dawnbrighter Darkness Shines (talk) 14:31, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. WilliamH (talk) 15:26, 23 March 2013 (UTC) Well, I opened the cupboard door, and found Narnia. The three given accounts are ✅ with each other. They are also confirmed with:

The oldest account I could find is. I request that clerks move this case to reflect this presumed master for future reference. All accounts except the master have been blocked and tagged via the CheckUser interface. WilliamH (talk) 15:44, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Indeffed the master per massive sockpuppetry. Closing. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 16:22, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

13 April 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Same edit as with previous sock to War in Afghanistan (2001–present) Darkness Shines (talk) 23:39, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Based on the last sockfarm, CU may be advisable. Darkness Shines (talk) 23:54, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * As DS says, the archive suggests that a sleeper check would be prudent. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  13:21, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Czarcalvinsk is ❌, but I did find on the IP used by the master and previous socks. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:57, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm comfortable blocking this account on the back of one suspicious edit. It's possible that this is someone else. Come back if there are further problems. Closing. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 16:02, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

25 June 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I am fairly certain this is PC just from the edits, there are a few obvious similarities. Use of lower case in edit summaries at the beginning of a sentence 22 M C PC They also share the same habit of leaving no edit summaries at all on major edits 22 M C PC And a PC sock was posting on the War in Afghanistan (2001–present) talk page about infrastructure and how certain information is superfluous 22 M C has made the same claims unrelated nonsense doesn't belong in it Darkness Shines (talk) 20:44, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - The evidence presented is far too tenuous to lead to any sort of action. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:38, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Insufficient evidence at this time. Closing without prejudice to consider if more evidence comes to light.  Closing. Dennis Brown &#124; 2¢ &#124; © &#124;  WER  21:58, 29 June 2013 (UTC)