Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PeterAmbrosia/Archive

10 December 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Previous four socks have been proven correct and blocked by User:Tnxman307. The fifth new one I discovered through investigating at. Edits by Fattestalbert highly resemble  and the motive for the Conflict of Interest is the same. Deltasim (talk) 19:24, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  00:08, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * All of these accounts except for PeterAmbrosia, UnbornClarity, and ArealFatRabbit are already blocked by a checkuser as sockpuppets of PeterAmbrosia. UnbornClarity looks very much like a sockpuppet, but has not edited since February, so there is no need for any action unless and until the account is reactivated. (For the record, UnbornClarity's only non-userspace edit was a "delete" comment in an AfD created by Fattestalbert, arguably in bad faith.) ArealFatRabbit's editing is effectively identical to edits months ago by PeterAmbrosia and Fattestalbert, so I am prepared to block ArealFatRabbit indefinitely. I shall also block PeterAmbrosia, as he has returned to sockpuppetry after having apparently left. in view of the fact that this person has in the past used a number of sockpuppets in a short time, with overlapping dates, and has now returned with another sockpuppet, I would like to ask a clerk to support a checkuser in case of sleepers. Any such CU would have to work just from ArealFatRabbit, as all the other accounts are stale. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:32, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Based on the evidence above, I ran a check and didn't see any discernable sleepers. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 21:20, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Closing.

23 January 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I'm going out on a limb here but I'm thinking that this is a sleeper sock of PeterAmbrosia, first edits were at an afd and linking to a previous discussion that was started by a sockpuppet []. Thinking this may be a duck test sock but a checkuser might be needed as well. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 00:54, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ that the following accounts are related: T. Canens (talk) 03:18, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * All socks blocked. Someguy1221 (talk) 10:24, 23 January 2013 (UTC)