Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Peterdow123/Archive

19 March 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Peterdow123 has previously created Steve wilks, Sandra.Stamenkovic91 has now created Steve Wilks (musician). All of these accounts/IPs are SPAs opposing deletion at Articles for deletion/Steve Wilks (musician). 1 IP is definitely him, per, and the content of that AfD shows all the IPs are the same person Joseph2302 (talk) 11:22, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' the ips are not the same that is a false statement and i see how you work build up negative i am here in support of the page and that is clear petredow (talk) 11:56, 19 March 2016 (UTC)


 * This shows you're clearly 2.126.101.3 for one thing.
 * Also, don't use big text, it gives the impression you're shouting. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:23, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

that is a false statement i am here in favour of page but that is not me on the ip address check and then reply to me   petredow (talk) 11:59, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

This is ridiculous. You can't make such a statement just because two accounts defend and edit the same article. Have it ever occurred to you, that those might be the people who are working on the same assignment given by somebody else? And you can definitely check the IP address or anything else you want. I have only one account! --Sandra.Stamenkovic91 (talk) 12:10, 19 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes it did occur to me that you might be different people. It also occurred to me that it's surprisingly common how often SPA sockpuppets occur at AfD discussions.
 * Also, seems rather convenient that this is your first edit for days,, straight after posted. Coincidence? Joseph2302 (talk) 12:25, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Of course it is a coincidence, I am receiving notifications on my e-mail, and I respond as soon as I can. I'm not planning to defend myself against you, If you think there is something wrong, prove it! I'm all for it! And I expect an apology afterwards. --Sandra.Stamenkovic91 (talk) 12:30, 19 March 2016 (UTC) And just to be clear, I've created the page Steve Wilks (musician) first, because someone asked me to. Who edited the page afterward, and is it because of the same person who asked me in the first place, it is non of my business. Your assumptions can go as far as your imagination. --Sandra.Stamenkovic91 (talk) 12:36, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Someone asked you to create it? Joseph2302 (talk) 12:40, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

i am not :Sandra.Stamenkovic91|talk]])  check that person is not me i am in the uk check lol this is a weird conversation petredow (talk) 13:28, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Yes, a friend of mine asked me as a favor, since I know how to post an article on Wikipedia. But that's not important. I live in Serbia, my name is Sandra Stamenkovic, and I am female, and whats more important, I have only one account. --Sandra.Stamenkovic91 (talk) 18:13, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
 * It is not allowed to post articles on behalf of someone else. Wikipedia account should be used only individually, and shared accounts are not allowed. Posting articles on behalf of somebody else is equivalent to letting other people use your account, and that is blockable offence.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  00:09, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Ok Vanja, I didn't know that. I thought that there is nothing wrong with writing an article by myself, and getting the idea of a subject from someone else. The article is deleted anyway, and it won't happen again. --Sandra.Stamenkovic91 (talk) 07:40, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please, compare those two. They created two very similar articles.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  12:36, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The and  accounts are technically ❌.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  17:47, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  11:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)