Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Peterwoodwilson/Archive

20 January 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Appears to be a clear case of block evasion. Compare this with this (both mistaking the Teahouse talk page for the Teahouse questions page, both asking the same question about the same external link, and both using similar language). Cordless Larry (talk) 19:18, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * One of LettyAbs's few other edits removed an AfD template from Artificial Intelligence Multi Soft, which was created by Stenawilsom, who also seems to address other editors in a similar manner. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:34, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I don't know who had been here without any prior permission of mine. I have been here for the first time. I always uses the respectful language for everyone. But if the community doesn't want me use such language then I will stop using it. I am also not aware that the query which I had is already available in the Teahouse. I thought I had asked this query for the first. If you had the query already then let me know why this query wasn't resolved. Because of this unresolved query I asked a question but instead of getting answer, what I am getting is inquiry. I don't want to disrespect anybody, unless if someone is not playing with my respect. I am sorry If I had done anything wrong, but I was not the person who had visited here before me with the same query. I hope that the community will understand and I will try to find out whop had used my IP without concerning me.--LettyAbs (talk) 20:26, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please, compare those three accounts.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  23:32, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The three accounts are ✅, blocked, and tagged.
 * I suspect this person or persons (one can never be sure with paid editing) is a relatively incompetent paid editor. That means there are likely earlier accounts, one of which is the "master". However, absent a behavioral pattern established by this particular paid editing, it is hard to impose blocks. These three accounts did not use a single legitimate IP. Every one was a proxy server of some sort, and they used an interesting variety of them. Although I did not block any other accounts, I did block various ranges for damage control generally. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 05:02, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Excellent call, User:Bbb23, you are 100% correct about (1) incompetent and (2) earlier accounts. See:


 * I'd already blacklisted the site as a result of this person's "efforts" on Iraqi dinar. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:23, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I'd already blacklisted the site as a result of this person's "efforts" on Iraqi dinar. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:23, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I'd already blacklisted the site as a result of this person's "efforts" on Iraqi dinar. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:23, 27 January 2016 (UTC)