Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PhaedrusM/Archive

03 January 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

There is a huge number of SPA accounts at Articles for deletion/Kenneth O'Keefe (2nd nomination), largely with the same opinion and writing style, some are simply vandalising the page. There are even more SPAs in the article itself, although some of them are stale. No idea of the true sockmaster, PhaedrusM is simply the oldest of the bunch, although I suspect there are more. Hairhorn (talk) 19:02, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 90.206.103.186 restored some of Adam Kallender's posts, so he's probably involved. PhaedrusM doesn't seem to have the same POV as the rest. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 19:29, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Adding a CU to see if this is meatpuppetry or sockpuppetry. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 19:26, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

✅:

All other accounts are ❌. No comment with regards to the above-reported IP address. –MuZemike 10:39, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Interesting. Well, of the confirmed, I picked Elizabeth Steinberg as the sockmaster, and blocked and tagged all the accounts as such. And the IP was blocked by Favonian independently of this. Closing for now. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:30, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

20 January 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Identical repetitive keep votes at AFDs. Two of these hit Articles for deletion/Ray E. Bornert II, though somebody reverted one of them. MrOllie (talk) 16:59, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
This needs to be moved - the sockmaster here is, who already has a case. In any case, the following are ✅ as being, who is blocked as a sock under the other case:
 * TN X Man 17:23, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Cavalry blocked and tagged them all, so I'm closing this. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 18:15, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 17:23, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Cavalry blocked and tagged them all, so I'm closing this. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 18:15, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 17:23, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Cavalry blocked and tagged them all, so I'm closing this. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 18:15, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 17:23, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Cavalry blocked and tagged them all, so I'm closing this. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 18:15, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 17:23, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Cavalry blocked and tagged them all, so I'm closing this. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 18:15, 20 January 2011 (UTC)