Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Philip J Fry/Archive

19 August 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

On eswiki, User:Damián80 is blocked for being a sock of User:Chema.

On enwiki, User:Chema is CU-blocked. Both Chema and Damián80 have been blocked independetly for edit warring on Lo que la vida me robó. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  03:34, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Excuse me, but coming this ?, I have not evaded my lock here ever, and I confirm that the account was mine Chema, now you've done in the Spanish Wikipedia can affect me here?. The times have blocked me here, I never evaded my block, on wikipedia in English, of course. IRC just now confirm what I did in the Spanish Wikipedia, now this can affect me here ?.-- Damián  (talk)  03:41, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * has already checked that (later renamed to ) is ✅ to  (later renamed to ). I am just waiting for on-wiki confirmation of the findings to block and tag. ☺ ·   Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  03:37, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * This is indeed my result. Clerks, please move this case to Damián80 as he is the 'master'. -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  03:39, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Moved to Damián80 right away before administrative action. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  03:53, 19 August 2014 (UTC)


 * After discussion with DQ, we would like input from who performed the CU-block on Chema, but did not reblock the Damian80; were there implications beyond these two accounts? If Chema was indef'ed as a block-evading sock of Damian80, now that Damian80 is unblocked it'd be a bit circular to reblock for evading the sock's block. ☺ ·   Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  04:03, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Just because Chema was blocked by a CU doesn't make it a CU block. ;) I don't recall the exact circumstances of the block, but once it became clear that these accounts were the same person, it was also clear that the newer one was being used contrary to policy, e.g. editing the same topics, editing project space, etc. According to the logs, I have not run a check on either account. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:54, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I think we can probably leave this as is. If sockpuppetry occurs in the future we can address this then. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

24 September 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I know that I maybe too late to report this but a certain move in the page Wild at Heart ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wild_at_Heart_(telenovela)&diff=prev&oldid=677415824 Nyanchoka 19:11, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I know that I maybe too late to report this but a certain move in the page Wild at Heart (|here ) by a certain user who joined wikipedia this January and has made 15 edits as you can see |here. I suspect that this user is a sock of if not  himself.Reasons being;how can a rarely editor in wikipedia takes interest in a move and as you can see the language pattern of the two users is all the same.As you can see here the two start a conversation in a sarcastic way |here, |here and you can see the user's special contributions |here.Moreover the user speaks Spanish.Am just suspecting and its not personal.Nyanchoka 19:54, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
 * All started when I moved Corazón indomable page.Then began an edit war.Two days later the page was moved page Corazón indomable to Wild at Heart (telenovela)

Additionally
 * Both are interested with Corazón indomable page move.
 * Both Speak Spanish
 * I think the two are in cahoots when ElGatoSaez moved the page Corazón indomable to Wild at Heart (telenovela) and clearly supported  yet he/she is not an active editor.Nyanchoka 19:54, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify, this person is not me. ElGatoSaez is a user of Wikipedia in Spanish, see their contributions here.--  Philip J Fry   (talk)  02:09, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * @,what suspicions are you talking about?I gave all the necessary evidence and it could have been fair if you stated what was specifically missing so that I can gather.The two users did something suspicious and I had to report it.Don't you think that it is suspicious enough that a Spanish Wikipedia user gets suddenly interested to move a page in English Wikipedia?I think focus should be taken on the specific suspected user.Finally I have stated that I had one more account apart from this one and I acknowledged it in my talk page,so please stop crucifying me as far as I know the matter is already solved.Nyanchoka 09:47, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I've declined the CU request. I don't think there's enough evidence here to connect ElGatoSaez to Philip J Fry. I think the filer's motive is suspicious. In addition to Sockpuppet investigations/Nyanchoka, I believe there are ongoing disputes between the two editors. I'll let a clerk make a final determination, but my inclination is to decline the report. I have no comment as to whether ElGatoSaez is the sock of another master. .--Bbb23 (talk) 01:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Indeed, the evidence is too weak. I'm closing this.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  09:49, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

He has his account blocked in Spanish Wikipedia due several Sockpuppets TelenovelasXpert (talk) 17:49, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Nothing new here. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 18:09, 30 November 2017 (UTC)