Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Philip J Milton/Archive

Report date October 13 2009, 15:24 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

First ediyt after account creation was to immediately remove a spedy tag. I call a duck when I se one and this is quacking Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:24, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Hell In A Bucket (talk)
 * Per discussion on Nikki bakers page, she is a Personal assistant to Phillip. I have advised her about coi etc and such. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:45, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Per nikki BaKER she created the Phillip acxcount as well. She did so because she thought it would have to be his name to write the article. I suggest blocking and deleting the phillip account as she has her own now. I have advised her if she can give me sources I will attempt to write a article to bypass the COI. I would suggest not blocking Nikkis account as she is attempting to digest our ules now and came out with the whole account thing. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:17, 13 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:24, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

talk:Nathan| T]] 18:51, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * as moot per the above. Nathan [[User


 * Still needs a call from an admin on blocking one or the other account (suggest the Philip J Milton account) and warning the the remaining. Nathan  T 21:34, 13 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions
 * User:Philip J Milton has been indefinitely softblocked as a role account. The user will still be able to use the User:Nikki Baker account to edit. Please mind WP:COI. MuZemike 00:58, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I also left the account intentionally untagged as this isn't technically socking. MuZemike 00:59, 15 October 2009 (UTC)