Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Philippe17121/Archive

03 July 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

A few days ago the sockmaster had the articles Philippe Gérard and On A Long Breath (film) speedily deleted. New account Reveuse73 was created for the sole purpose of defending these articles. When User:Tokyogirl79 deleted the articles, she warned the sockmaster of abusing multiple accounts Special:Diff/669286558. Today, Reveuse again came to defend another of his articles up for deletion as seen here: Special:Diff/669588729. The sockmaster has claimed that he is not Reveuse73, requesting CU to confirm. -War wizard90 (talk) 04:34, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - IMO the behavioural evidence is almost sufficient for me believe this is indeed sockpuppetry, but I'm still endorsing a CU check to really confirm my suspicions (and perhaps find sleepers ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  16:50, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Technically, the two accounts are between ❌ and .--Bbb23 (talk) 17:12, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Are you still willing to block or should we close this?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:44, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Despite the CU result, I've Reveuse73 as suspected based on behavioural evidence -- the account hadn't edited since July 5th where it denied socking allegations anyways, so there likely won't be harm done by blocking. The user can always file a convincing block appeal. ☺ ·   Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  23:50, 26 July 2015 (UTC)