Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pickles0001/Archive

Evidence submitted by Dawnseeker2000
There has only been one article here that both sock and puppet have edited so this one is simple. It's on Remote backup service. Pickles0001 added 5KB worth of text to the article here and I checked the contents with google and found the very same wording on a few websites like this one. Search that web page and the content added for the this text; it appears on both: "While the initial years of these service providers were about capturing market share distributed among the top few providers, the large industry players took cognizance of the importance and the role that these online backup providers were playing in the web services arena and M&A activity has became quite predominant in the last few years."

I was just leaving work and did not post a notice on that user's page about a possible copyright violation. Nor did I leave an edit summary as to why. So when I get home I see that Urboogyman re-added the content. Once again I removed the material and left an explanation this time. Dawnseeker2000  23:19, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * Appears to be a WP:DUCK case of sockpuppetry. Both accounts have been blocked. No tagging is necessary here. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 20:18, 31 July 2010 (UTC)