Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pidgeotkid2/Archive

05 September 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Sock breach by Pidgeotkid2, indefinitely blocked for long-term sneak vandalism and WP:BLP abuse on pro-wrestling articles. Papacha (talk) 02:57, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Also blocked after recent evasion under handle Pidgeotkid. Papacha (talk) 03:24, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Blocked and tagged. Jafeluv (talk) 06:18, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

09 September 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Apart from the obvious, harasses one user for his inability to be successfully blocked and leaves a talk page message for another recounting his past flirtations (dunno, suppose they're going steady now) with the process. Plus some rudimentary vandalism on the side now aside from WP:BLP vios, so that's new I guess? Papacha (talk) 08:45, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Wondering if CheckUser is needed to indicate whether the fellow has any other handles or if accounts keep being opened under a dynamic IP. Played at being repentant in the past but no real deterrents now. Papacha (talk) 09:04, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  12:33, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * As far as CheckUser is concerned, the connection is . That said, the username and editing behavior are a dead giveaway. Because of this I have blocked the account. As far as any type of IP blocks are concerned, the user is editing from a rather large range of dynamic IPs. Unfortunately, this might just be a case of whack-a-mole. Tiptoety  talk 00:17, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Tagging and closing.