Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pirokiazuma/Archive

24 June 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Account created very recently to continue the edit warring of Pirokiazuma on Divergence of the sum of the reciprocals of the primes. They have identical incorrect content to replace the previous correct content. Their joint edits have been reverted by several editors. Pirokiazuma has been reported at WP:ANI for edit warring and seems to have created problems on multiple articles. Mathsci (talk) 09:26, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * First of all, the account shall be immediately blocked as a rampant edit warrior. I wonder what are sysops waiting for. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:34, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * That is not how SPI reports work (in this case with checkuser). Similarly the initial report on the edit-warring of the probable master account should have been at WP:AN3, not at WP:ANI. Mathsci (talk) 09:38, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * is an obvious sock of the same master, and also shall be blocked without any deliberation: the situation is clear. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:39, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Not as clear as all that since Pirokiazuma has made a subsequent reversion. If you're not used to SPI reports, please don't double guess administrators or checkusers. Mathsci (talk) 09:45, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already blocked per WP:DUCK, closing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:27, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

28 June 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Recently created account. Several new uses have made a series of attempts to simplify one section of the article Divergence of the sum of the reciprocals of the primes. The master account was blocked by Arthur Rubin. Other suspected sockpuppet accounts include, who duplicated Pirokiaxuma's edits and was blocked by Arthur Rubin: and who made superficial but unhelpful changes to the same section and was blocked by Kww. The current single purpose account again trjed twice to "simplify" exactly the same section by a new argument that is incorrect. This seems to be the same person with an obsession with this particular proof. Each account repeatedly inserts the new false argument. (Perhaps the article could be temporarily semiprotected.) Mathsci (talk) 06:55, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
is yet another faulty simplification, at least according to the mathemeticians working on it. (and the provided sources). is a different faulty simplification, but considering proximity of editing, and other misc editing habits such as edit summary usage, I'm quite confident they are related. Due to the obvious long term edit warring and multiple accounts, checkuser would be good. NativeForeigner Talk 22:00, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅, WilliamH (talk) 05:45, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Took care of the one missed block, closing. Dennis Brown &#124; 2¢ &#124; © &#124; WER  16:12, 29 June 2013 (UTC)