Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Polopaladin/Archive

25 April 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Based on behaviour on his contribution on George Town, Penang article that return the version of Polopaladin back. The user has previously vows (article ownership) and threatening to change the content that satisfy his personal view as can be seen on the article talkpage history. The user before also have breaching a username policy by using my name in another his previous sock that have been blocked. As anyone can see, this is the article version that the current sock continue to restore. Herman Jaka (talk) 17:27, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * +Personal attacks with racist statement towards me which also previously done in one of his sock accounts. Herman Jaka (talk) 08:29, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * +More hate statement against Indonesian people. Herman Jaka (talk) 09:57, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

My suspicion arose from the same behaviour this user continuously tried to restore an article version full with bare links and messed paragraph just like his sock master did before, as you can see also on Jakaidiot  (one of his sock that was blocked for personal attack against me) and an IP that possibly was related to him. Other previous sock accounts that have been blocked are this (sock master), this, this, this and this. The protest against me and the user rude behaviour can be seen back on his talkpage sock account of Jakaidiot which also continue into a new sock account as can be seen on my talkpage. Herman Jaka (talk) 01:37, 27 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The difference between and  can be seen from the similar restoration of the article section header title which could be suspected that both of the users are related. While for this, it can be proved from his block log  that the user has abusing multiple accounts that leading him being blocked. Here are the list of all socks accounts that have been blocked indefinitely, all of which focusing the same articles either on George Town, Penang and Penang, similar like what Buonkee focusing for:


 * 1) Polopaladin (sock master)
 * 2) Polopaladin02
 * 3) Polopaladin03
 * 4) Polopaladin04
 * 5) Jakaidiot (Username violation with personal attack against me)

Other than that, there is also an IP that is suspected related to him, based on the behaviour of article ownership.
 * 1) 118.101.161.153
 * Herman Jaka (talk) 04:29, 28 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Stale? I have present all the proofs I got and as can you see the user also keeping to asking for a page protection request to prevent anyone from editing it just like several of the previous socks did which looks more like an ownership. There should at least a check to prove he is not one of the sock. But okay then, if that is the definite answer, I just leave the user like that and refrain myself from any related topics the user don't want anyone to edit. Herman Jaka (talk) 13:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Arigato . Herman Jaka (talk) 05:45, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' If my account is a sock puppet account, I would have reverted every single word, did I ? I didn't. I made a number of corrections to your often factually incomplete facts. I believe Herman Jaka has claimed I am a sock puppet in bad faith, as he doesn't want his article to be editted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buonkee (talk • contribs)

Racist ? He doesn't seem to know what is the meaning of the term racist. I never provoke his race. The problem with this Indonesian is he keeps reverting back to his article, thinking that his version is better. I am Malaysian, by the way. I will not stand idly by when a foreigner gets facts wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buonkee (talk • contribs) 09:28, 26 April 2016 (UTC)


 * +Personal attacks with racist statement towards me A speculative racist attack by Herman Jaka. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buonkee (talk • contribs) 09:48, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
 * 1) At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
 * 2) At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
 * 3) In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  19:22, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Please, explain me similarity between, , and .  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:12, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * All of the sock accounts are stale (unless I missed something), so there would be nothing for me to check against.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  16:48, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * is a checkuser term denoting that the technical information logged by the checkuser tool has expired. The servers do not hold checkuser data indefinitely, and in this case the master account and its sock accounts have no technical information attached to them; there is nothing for me to compare Buonkee to. That doesn't preclude a behavioural investigation.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 15:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)


 * has been blocked based upon behavioral evidence which makes this and prior accounts indistinguishable. WP:BEANS likely applies here, but please do not hesitate to contact me if there are any questions or concerns.  Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:27, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Looks like we're done here. Closing.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:49, 5 May 2016 (UTC)