Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Possibility1/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All WP:SPA editing the same article, Parkstone Equities. All have similar style names and at least 1 user has removed WP:PROD. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:59, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Group 1 – the following accounts are ✅ to each other:
 * Group 2 – the following accounts are ✅ to each other and ❌ to Group 1:
 * Blocked and tagged the Group 1 accounts. Blocked without tags the Group 2 accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:47, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Tagged group 2 as socks of Clickerflicker3, the oldest account. Closing. GABgab 14:15, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Actually, hang on, I just noticed that removed the CSD tag from Parkstone Equities. How do they fit into the picture? Thanks, GABgab 14:18, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Forefog55t and are ✅ to the Group 2 accounts. Blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:02, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm so sorry,, but has just popped up, too: ... Thanks, GABgab 15:29, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Between and  to Group 1.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:35, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm leaning towards a block due to: the similar use of "we," the same insistence on keeping the page so they can work on it further, and the fact that they referred to the removal of links by the master. But I would like to hear your view and any third opinions. Thanks, GABgab 15:50, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I lean toward a block mostly because I don't think any of these accounts is here to contribute positively to the encyclopedia.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:54, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * - Fair enough; the promotional intent is quite blatant. Please block the sock. Thanks, GABgab 16:00, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing (or at least trying to).--Bbb23 (talk) 16:26, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm so sorry,, but has just popped up, too: ... Thanks, GABgab 15:29, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Between and  to Group 1.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:35, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm leaning towards a block due to: the similar use of "we," the same insistence on keeping the page so they can work on it further, and the fact that they referred to the removal of links by the master. But I would like to hear your view and any third opinions. Thanks, GABgab 15:50, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I lean toward a block mostly because I don't think any of these accounts is here to contribute positively to the encyclopedia.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:54, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * - Fair enough; the promotional intent is quite blatant. Please block the sock. Thanks, GABgab 16:00, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing (or at least trying to).--Bbb23 (talk) 16:26, 8 October 2016 (UTC)