Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pournick/Archive

Evidence submitted by Khoikhoi
User admits that he/she is (who is currently blocked) with most of these socks. The remaining IP address reverts to the same version as Pournick. I know that CheckUser is not necessary to confirm these accounts and IP addresses, but the main reason I am filing this CU report is to determine whether there are any remaining socks and whether a range block would be appropriate. Khoikhoi 03:29, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, there is one account that cannot be confirmed solely based on self-admission: Rahi1383. Therefore I'd like to slightly modify my original statement. Khoikhoi 03:40, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by Khoikhoi 03:29, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

,, no CU necessary. The relevant range is 	188.158.192.0/21, which seems okay to softblock. Timotheus Canens (talk) 02:27, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Rahi1383 indefinitely blocked and tagged (as with the other registered accounts), and Pournick's block is now indefinite. The IP range has already been blocked. –MuZemike 00:00, 25 February 2010 (UTC)