Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Powerpokmon/Archive

23 December 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Incredibly obvious sockpuppet. Powerpokmon has been distorting tables at "The Real Housewives of " articles and has taken exception to the fact that I've been trying to fix these tables. He has now created CatloverWK90 whose first edits were to Powerpokmon's user page. He then distorted tables at articles that I've warned him about. He has even used the sock to edit my talk page, right after the puppetmaster edited it.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 14:04, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I admit, I created another account. But I only made it to get away from the nonsense with AussieLegend while at the same time, edit my User page, which has information about my "Real Webkinz" series (which doesn't really qualify to be its own legit Wikipedia page because it's a written web series on a website) Please take into consideration that making the other account was not of bad intention. And to quote myself from his Talk page:

"First of all, if anyone is "distorting" the tables, it's you. The name column has always been shorter than the season column. And now you're coming in and saying it can't be like that for The Real Housewives of Cheshire table. The name column is unnecessarily long and looks like crap. You also changed the style of The Real Housewives of Melbourne table and it looks different than the other The Real Housewives tables and now you're saying no one can change it back to what it used to be. "How dare they distort the table and make it look like all the other tables" is basically your attitude. I thought the editing process of Wikipedia was a group effort. Not a dictatorship. I'm actually trying to make the tables look a little better and took your advice about widths adding up to the correct number. But my edits have been in vain. In fact I was afraid of taking out false information/gossip on The Real Housewives of Orange County page because I was afraid that you would come along and say I "distorted" something and threaten me with some sort of administrative action. I'm afraid to make any edits. And the edit on your User page was a honest mistake on my part. Sometimes I click on the wrong link. I did it with Orangemike before I realized I was writing on his User page and quickly abandoned my edit and wrote it on his Talk page. Why would I write on your User page on purpose? (Powerpokmon (talk) 13:48, 23 December 2014 (UTC))"

In addition, I apologize if this is the wrong place to defend myself against these claims. I would also like to point out that I know who I am and I'm not a bully. I joined Wikipedia to make reasonable edits, see what it was all about, and make pages better. (Powerpokmon (talk) 14:29, 23 December 2014 (UTC))


 * It's inappropriate to create a sockpuppet generally, but especially to edit articles that you have been warned about. It's deceptive. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 14:40, 23 December 2014 (UTC)


 * AussieLegend, you were the one that decided to change up The Real Housewives of Cheshire and The Real Housewives of Melbourne tables. It was perfectly fine before. All that needed to be done is make the widths add up to the correct number. Once again, making the other account was not of bad intention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Powerpokmon (talk • contribs) 14:40, 24 December 2014‎ (UTC)


 * This is not the place to discuss the actual content issues. However I will say that tables in all of the articles contained multiple errors. It wasn't simply a matter of fixing column widths as I've explained elsewhere. More importantly, when adding content to this report, please add it below this post, not at the top of the report as you've been doing. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 14:57, 23 December 2014 (UTC)


 * It's annoying me that I can't figure out how to add it to the bottom on your post. I don't see that little editing icon other than the top of the page. I will agree not to "distort" the tables any longer as we obviously have different viewpoints on what looks good and I just can't win here. I never really had any problems until you came forward. In fact, I will not edit any Wikipedia pages any more as it seems I can't do anything right according to long and complicated standards and guidelines. As far as the other account is concerned, I will not be using it. I wish I could just delete it. The only thing I will be editing is my own User page. (Powerpokmon (talk) 15:16, 23 December 2014 (UTC))
 * Deja Vue. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 15:37, 23 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Can we agree to close this case, AussieLegend?(Powerpokmon (talk) 16:44, 23 December 2014 (UTC))

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * You can't agree to close a case, plus its obvious with that that your trying to hide something more than just this account. That said, ✅:
 * I'm indef'ing the sockmaster and all the socks, Mgaisser for sockpuppetry, proceeding to understate sockpuppetry when admitting, deception of the community, and inability to understand and follow our policies. -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  16:54, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm indef'ing the sockmaster and all the socks, Mgaisser for sockpuppetry, proceeding to understate sockpuppetry when admitting, deception of the community, and inability to understand and follow our policies. -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  16:54, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm indef'ing the sockmaster and all the socks, Mgaisser for sockpuppetry, proceeding to understate sockpuppetry when admitting, deception of the community, and inability to understand and follow our policies. -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  16:54, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm indef'ing the sockmaster and all the socks, Mgaisser for sockpuppetry, proceeding to understate sockpuppetry when admitting, deception of the community, and inability to understand and follow our policies. -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  16:54, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm indef'ing the sockmaster and all the socks, Mgaisser for sockpuppetry, proceeding to understate sockpuppetry when admitting, deception of the community, and inability to understand and follow our policies. -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  16:54, 23 December 2014 (UTC)


 * With all accounts blocked and tagged, I think we're set here. Mike V  •  Talk  19:53, 23 December 2014 (UTC)