Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PrakashGollapalli007/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Creating Ajay Reddy  FITINDIA   11:16, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Thanks, GABgab 15:12, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * - Please check these accounts +
 * ✅, and  belong to the same editor.   didn't show up while running the three accounts; you'll need to establish a stronger reason for me to run a check against that account. - Mailer Diablo 23:06, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅, and  belong to the same editor.   didn't show up while running the three accounts; you'll need to establish a stronger reason for me to run a check against that account. - Mailer Diablo 23:06, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅, and  belong to the same editor.   didn't show up while running the three accounts; you'll need to establish a stronger reason for me to run a check against that account. - Mailer Diablo 23:06, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I included them because of this anomalous edit, but it's no big deal. Thanks, GABgab 23:44, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Everyone else is, btw. GABgab 23:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  07:29, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Created Jollyhits which was delete under this name Jolly Hits. User:SpacemanSpiff has blocked User:Rajufilms for Spam.This was the earlier case Sockpuppet investigations/PrakashGollapalli007/Archive. Pinging GAB.  FITINDIA  12:43, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' Also, I blocked
 * Note: This should be moved to Sockpuppet investigations/PrakashGollapalli007 but I don't want to mess things up, so I'll leave that for someone in a higher pay grade.
 * 1)  as an obvious sock, while I blocked
 * 2)  for username+spam vio, and ToS vio. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  14:17, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already blocked, so closing. ~ Rob 13 Talk 14:36, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * This was copied from Sockpuppet investigations/Chand57. Sro23 (talk) 15:54, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

More Sandalwood Talkies spam. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:52, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Sandalwood Talkies was created by Malharhussain and a previous revision was created with very similar content by Ashok Chowdary Yalamati which is blocked as a suspected sockpuppet of Prakash. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:58, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
 * 1) At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
 * 2) At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
 * 3) In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  00:01, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * since I've added some comments. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Blocked and closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:08, 28 January 2018 (UTC)