Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Press10corsocomo/Archive

19 January 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Account created when suspected puppet master blocked, articles edited are the same, all promotional (first editor blocked for username which is the company being promoted (one of the articles is about a boyfriend of the woman running the company). Adding another, the boyfriend's name is the name of this account. Dougweller (talk) 18:09, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I thought, probably wrongly, that the new account would have to be linked to the old. If that's not the case I apologise. Dougweller (talk) 21:47, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Press10corsocomo was blocked because of a username violation, so registering another account is acceptable. The second account, Krisruhs hasn't edited recently, and only kept their edits to the article that is, presumably, about them. I'm inclined not to act on any of them yet, as I think the two named are meatpuppets. But another opinion on this, maybe? —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 21:11, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * That's okay. I'm closing for now, but if any further developments arise, feel free to relist. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:20, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

21 April 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Editing the exact same articles. Tomtomn00 (talk • contributions) 12:30, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Two admins have already said that this is the same user,, and the account has come back under a name that doesn't violate the username policy. There may be a conflict of interest, but this isn't for SPI. The  Helpful  One  15:36, 21 April 2012 (UTC)