Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pritampandey/Archive

21 January 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Pritampandey has created 5 versions of his autobiography. The master already having received a level 4 warning the IP was used to remove speedies from the latest version. Samratpandey's sole edit is the creation of Ajhai Pani which links back to the master's autobio. The IP's only edit aside from the speedy removal was to this article. IP seems to be a sock, and Samratpandey either a sock or meatpuppet. Bazj (talk) 12:43, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅. I blocked the master for two weeks, and indeffed/tagged the puppet. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Recreation of Pritam pandey. Despite previous SPI, master has again used a sock, presumably to deflect association with the previous A7/G11 efforts & puppetry. for (talk)  09:24, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Yes, it is almost promoting the master but needs research on deleted revisions  NasssaNser 11:11, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
as the master is. Moving to the open queue for an admin clerk to review the deleted revisions. Ivanvector 🍁  (talk) 13:26, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Minor point. You didn't move it to the "open queue", although the queue it's in is fine.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:51, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I guess you're right. What would you call it? The "checkuser declined, awaiting behavioural investigation" queue? Ivanvector 🍁  (talk) 13:53, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Hehe, no. You declined the request; that automatically goes into that queue, so no need to say anything about the queue. But you have something more to say: "An admin clerk needs to review the deleted revisions." Actually, the best queue is the Admin queue because you need an admin - doesn't have to be a clerk.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:25, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I thought about marking it for admin action, but then I thought I need an admin to review but not necessarily push admin buttons (it needs review by an admin clerk, not action by an admin) so I did what I did. But then again I guess reviewing deleted revisions is an admin action, so you're probably right. I went ahead and changed it.


 * Admin requested to review these users' deleted revisions for a behavioural link. Ivanvector 🍁  (talk) 16:17, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Sock indeffed and tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  17:05, 15 August 2016 (UTC)