Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Priyanjali singh/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This account appears to have been created to attack me and they have opened a fake investigation against me accusing me of recreating Kenan Crnkić using a sock account and the special character in article's title. Kalekar M is purposely creating and editing pages which i have contributed to and Priyanjali singh trying to portary me as a sock of Kalekar M. Priyanjali singh is an undisclosed paid editor as can been seen on their talk page and when i tried to find out the same here, they ignored it but when Kalekar M on 5 December, recreated Kenan Crnkïc copy/pasting from previous article, Priyanjali singh immidietly got active tagging it as COI and started this investigation and their only contribution was on Kenan Crnkïc. Since i doubt this page may have been created by themselves and not just this they have not disclosed paid editing and have been editing affected pages, i would request a Check user to be carried out here. Faizal batliwala (talk) 15:33, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . The country is the same, but the ISP, user agents, and everything else are different. This will need a behavioral examination.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:53, 7 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Something is rotten in the state of Denmark. There are two accounts, Faizal batliwala and Priyanjali singh, who are each accusing the other of being Kalekar M's sockmaster. Frankly, both of those accounts look suspicious to me, and I wouldn't be surprised if one or both are mercenary (which would potentially make this duelling paid farms). I can confirm that both of the pages in question (about Kenan Crnk.*) were near-identical, but Kalekar is also pretty obviously a sleeper - they were created during the AfD, then a week later gamed ACPERM and posted that article in a way that avoided detection (by changing the diacritics). Based on behavior so far, Kalekar is more likely Priyanjali than Faizal, but I do not think there is definitive evidence. I considered taking the Solomon approach and cutting all of these editors in half blocking both Priyanjali and Faizal, but I have instead Kalekar as somebody's sock. Again - both of these accounts are very suspicious to me, but I do not have enough evidence to sock or UPE block at this time. Closing. GeneralNotability (talk) 20:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)