Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Promenademallmanagment/Archive

15 January 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This account was created and began editing The Promenade Shopping Centre‎ within 2 minutes of the former account being blocked and replicated many of the inappropriate formatting changes made by the former account to this article.  Dwpaul  Talk   04:18, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Please disregard. I note the block of the alleged puppeteer was only due to its name, not vandalism or its edits, so the creation of an account with a different name was in fact an appropriate response (even if its edits are inappropriate.  Dwpaul   Talk

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Closing per filer's request. Note that this doesn't preclude a possible future block for self-promotion though. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:21, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

17 January 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Suspected of block evasion (though master only blocked for 24h 12h, not now blocked). This user seemingly an SPA to make the same exact changes against consensus and policy at The Promenade Shopping Centre discussed on the article's Talk page.  Dwpaul  Talk   21:33, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

While we're at it, I suspect are the same user or at the very least associated with them (the latter blocked for username violation) as they all are apparent SPAs with the exact same target page and edits. SPI entirely at your discretion.  Dwpaul  Talk   21:38, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I merged this report with the withrawn report of User:Promenademallmanagment. Although it's true that the username block notice invited the user to create a new account, it did not invite them to create another promotional account but under a different name. Thus, in my view, the true master is the first and oldest account. Based on duck, I've indeffed and tagged the three puppets.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:34, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

31 January 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

New account's immediate and only second of 2 edits is to make a change to obscure article The Promenade Shopping Centre previously and repeatedly made by master and its associates Zack1189, Sarah8093 and Tree11667 against consensus and policy, all blocked after SPI.  Dwpaul  Talk   05:31, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK - the number is the same and not the number you get if you add the listed stores. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:24, 31 January 2014 (UTC)