Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Qmbv/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.


 * Identical edits at Margaret of Nevers: (using the master account to revert a revert of the puppet's contribution by User:Kansas Bear)
 * Overlap of interests is too extensive to be coincidental: Celia Homeford (talk) 10:15, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:22, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

2shill was created a few days after the last sock puppet was blocked and carried on editing the same content: Henry VI, Henry V , Philip II. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:00, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Frac6 was created two days ago and has jumped in to the same exact topic area: King John, Henry V.

Montarg is another new account that has jumped into the same topic area with the same style of edits.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ plus:
 * . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:55, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:55, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:55, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same topic focus as the previous accounts: Nevlos and Qmbv, Montarg, 6071m and 2shill. Celia Homeford (talk) 11:15, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, . — Berean Hunter   (talk)  13:37, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same topic focus as previous sock puppets: 1cesc,Nevlos -- 1cesc,6071m -- 1cesc,Montarg,2shill,Nevlos -- 1cesc,Montarg. Celia Homeford (talk) 09:55, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - The behaviour here is fairly generic, and therefore largely inconclusive, but the name and choice of subject matter is enough to warrant a check in my opinion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:10, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅, along with . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:35, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Compare with known sock puppet : once again the same topic focus and same focus on moving medieval nobility articles. Celia Homeford (talk) 12:10, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  20:12, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅ to those in the archive..
 * Mark closed. The SandDoctor  Talk 03:58, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

General contribs, but specifically the usual insertion of factoids into medieval English history articles and other discriminate information. Cheers! —— SerialNumber  54129  12:31, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Cabayi (talk) 14:06, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * - I can only repeat SirSputnik's comment on an earlier case in this stable: The behaviour here is fairly generic, and therefore largely inconclusive, but the name and choice of subject matter is enough to warrant a check in my opinion. Cabayi (talk) 14:09, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅ plus . —DoRD (talk)​ 16:28, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * - Please indef the socks. Cabayi (talk) 17:07, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * . Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:37, 2 April 2019 (UTC)