Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Qpmx10084/Archive

Evidence submitted by Petri Krohn
Long term vandalism and unsourced edits at Alan Dubin. Suspect user is running other socks to vandalize other articles. Petri Krohn (talk) 01:39, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Marknutley
Alan Dubin On this article all these users are making the same basic edits. The Qpmx10084 is already blocked as a vandalism only account. The other two seem intent on adding unsourced fanboy stuff to the article, nothing bad, just bigging the BLP up. mark 07:32, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * Case moved to correct sock master. Tiptoety  talk 16:47, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * is ;
 * The other two are ✅. Tiptoety  talk 16:54, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I indef blocked Fleurplan, and left MMNJ a warning about sockpuppeting. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:08, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

13 January 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Several months ago, a report was submitted concerning several different accounts adding unsourced information to the article Alan Dubin. One account (Fleurplan) was blocked and another (MMNJ) was warned about using sockpuppets. Recently, I'm starting to see the same behavior cropping up again. A new account exhibiting very similar behavior (new account, no edits to other articles, adding trivia/potential vandalism, returning the edit when it is undone for no source, not using edit summaries or attempting to talk to other editors) has edited the article and I have a strong feeling it's the same user. I appreciate any help you can give. Rnb (talk) 04:33, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Suspected sockmaster is. Will have to be addressed using behavioral evidence alone. -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 04:44, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Based on behavioral evidence, I've blocked and tagged the sock. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 17:46, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

18 January 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

History of adding hoax content to Alan Dubin January   (talk)  23:04, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Both accounts blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 00:19, 19 January 2011 (UTC)