Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Querigin/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

continously and mutually adding false, made-up anti-Vietnamese copy-edit contents in Vietnamese history articles, for examples: Tây Sơn dynasty, Quang Trung... 103.7.43.131 (talk) 22:36, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Hi. This ip tried filing two false reports after mass deleting content without explanation (see the geolocation for COI). He falsely claimed I was edit warring after being warned four times and reported me as such. The only warning for edit warring is the one this ip tried to give me after he mass deleted content without explanation and accused soneone who reverted him of being me. This was his false report.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=958634335&oldid=958633898

He also claims sourced content is made up and racist and is giving no explanation for his claims.

Taking a look at all our edits should clear up the situation.

I'm just going to copy these three responses imcluding mine from the noticeboard he filed one of them on which should explain it all.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=prev&oldid=958647570#User:Querigin_reported_by_103.7.43.131_(talk)_22:27,_24_May_2020_(UTC)


 * I just want to defend myself here. If you look at my contribs and User:Querigin's contribs, it's clear that we're different people. Additionally, if you geolocate 103.7.43.131's IP, you can see that they have a COI. Additionally, they keep on blanking well sourced, cited material that they deem "racist". This is the second time in a week that someone has accused me of being racist. If any admins here see this, I'd appreciate it if they propose some sort of rule that blocks IPs from doing this. Thanks, Thanoscar21 (talk) 22:37, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * He also filed a false report over here claiming I vandalized past four nonexistent warnings and am posting racism.Querigin (talk) 22:52, 24 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Per above, I would suggest a WP:BOOMERANG - this is clearly a disgruntled IP editor angry at the reverting editors. Cheers, -- puddleglum  2.0  00:04, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Querigin (talk) 01:23, 25 May 2020 (UTC)


 * This closing statement needs to be modified, since just blocked Queirigin as a confirmed sockpuppet of Rajmaan. — MarkH21talk 13:59, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Closing with no action due to insufficient evidence. I note that the filer has been blocked for edit warring and suspected block evasion. Mz7 (talk) 04:23, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The reason for Querigin's block is independent of this SPI. This SPI is still being closed with no action, particularly with respect to Thanoscar21. Mz7 (talk) 20:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)