Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/QuinteroP/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Suspected sock account registers three days ago with his first edit being this which shows they understand how Wikipedia works. He does some minor editing here and there then coincidentally jumps into this AFD & weighs in with a rationale that favors the suspected master sock account. Note that the suspected master sock account is a sleeper account that has been “Sleeping” since 2019 then resumes almost a year later, does some minor editing here & there then goes straight to creating the Lifefolder (company) which is why I believe he returned from his sleep. I believe the suspected master sock created the suspected sock account in anticipation of an impending AFD in order to use it to influence the outcome of the AFD. The timing of the sleeper account “waking up” and the suspected sock account created is way too convenient. I believe this is a combination of UPE and sockpuppetry. Celestina007 (talk) 17:27, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I am QuinteroP and I myself endorse the CPI request. I left a comment on Celestina0007's user talk page. WP:GOODFAITH I wrote: I was a contributor of the Spanish Wikipedia. I started as a contributor of the Venezuelan project. I am no longer involved with it and I am trying, as much as possible, to avoid Venezuelan politics. You can verify that I first registered there and then moved here (Francisco de Miranda article). Talking about politics has become way too dangerous in my home country. Just in case you want to know more about me. I stopped contributing in 2019, just after the Venezuelan presidential crisis started. That's my background.

Thus, I totally endorse this request. 100%!QuinteroP (talk) 18:55, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * appears ❌ as far as technical evidence goes.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   19:57, 18 December 2020 (UTC)


 * I've blocked both for unrelated reason. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 15:03, 24 December 2020 (UTC)