Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Quzeyli/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * one more, for the same reason:
 * one more, for the same reason:

Evidence submitted by Sardur
has recently been warned under AA2 remedies and enforcement, and blocked for edit-warring on Amaras Monastery, Yeghishe Arakyal Monastery and Tsitsernavank Monastery. Since then, he stopped edit-warring but carried on. Both use the same argument with the same sources (last example: Quzeyli ip), both edit during the same period (see their contributions). Although Quzeyli seems to edit from Azerbaijan (see his user page), and the ip seems to edit from Ankara, it's perhaps time to investigate whether these users are not a single one. Sardur (talk) 16:33, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * For the record: I would be curious to know what "abuse of rules" I would have made with this request. Sardur (talk) 21:10, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
is my close friend from Azerbaijan and we share fact and proofs with each other. --144.122.135.88 (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2010 (UTC) Another abuse of rules by --Quzeyli 20:08, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
, if not a sock, then it's clearly a violation of meatpuppetry policies. A violation of either policy is a blockable offenses for all parties involved. SpitfireTally-ho! 20:08, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1 week block + 1RR for three months on Armenian monasteries articles for the master, which is also limited to one account and may not edit through IPs. 48 hours for each IP. Tim Song (talk) 20:35, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Sardur
See the previous investigation for the background. is a new user; while his two first edits are on his user page, the next ones are directly on the three articles on which Quzeyli and the ip mentionned in the previous section (sock- or meatpuppetry) were edit-warring (Hay-siken's contributions). The argument used by this new user is exactly the same (, to be compared with this from one of the ips); also note the specific way to answer in a thread, with a bullet-point. This new account has been created a few hours after I warned Quzeyli and the ip of the previous SPI. Finally, Hay-siken's user page is very similar to Quzeyli's one. Sardur (talk) 08:05, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, I forgot to mention that Quzeyli has been blocked after the previous SPI (block log). Sardur (talk) 08:09, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * User:Hay-siken blocked as a rather obvious sockpuppet. Not really sure about what to do with Quzeyli; will leave it to another sysop to decide. NW ( Talk ) 11:52, 13 April 2010 (UTC)


 * ✅ --jpgordon:==( o ) 14:11, 13 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I reset their block in the meanwhile and left a note on their talk page.  E lockid  ( Talk ) 22:48, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Sardur
The case is still the same: see Sockpuppet investigations/Quzeyli/Archive. Pro memoria: following the last SPI, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Quzeyli/Archive&diff=355610502&oldid=355608791 1 week block + 1RR for three months on Armenian monasteries articles for the master (Quzeyli), which is also limited to one account and may not edit through IPs. 48 hours for each IP.] Articles's histories: Yeghishe Arakyal Monastery, Amaras Monastery, Tsitsernavank Monastery, Gandzasar monastery. Sardur (talk) 11:44, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) While Quzeyli didn't edit the concerned articles, one of the IPs (144.122.135.88) re-started the revert war on the same articles and for the same (addressed on pdd) reason. I've been told in the same SPI that the IP was a sock/meat; perhaps it's time to be sure of it.
 * 2) Yexeqnadzor contributed for the 1st time today, on the 4 mentioned monasteries (and only there), with the same argument, and during two minutes (i.e. immediately finding the four of them). A clear sock, imho.

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by Sardur (talk) 11:44, 25 May 2010 (UTC) . Kevin Rutherford (talk) 15:40, 26 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Accounts indeffed, IP hardblocked 3 months since it looks fairly static. Tim Song (talk) 16:14, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Sardur
Still the same... (yes, I'm fed up): see previous SPIs (revert war, topic ban) - see also history of Yeghishe Arakyal Monastery, Amaras Monastery, Tsitsernavank Monastery, Gandzasar monastery. Still no edit by Quzeyli, but revert to his position (this time with no argument, excepting the same - addressed - one) by these two new users (accounts created today). I honestly don't know what to do: I mean, I can't carry on filing SPIs on everyday... Sardur (talk) 23:52, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * More on this last sentence: I tried to find a compromise through e-mails (sometimes isolating opponents and trying so to discuss with them works) based on Dadivank Monastery. It didn't work here... and I don't know if I should still try: I mean, this is a sock/meat in a disruptive behaviour... Sardur (talk) 00:02, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Registered accounts blocked and tagged. IP hardblocked 31 hours. –MuZemike 14:36, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Sardur
Still the same story (see Sockpuppet investigations/Quzeyli/Archive). This account, created directly after the last SPI, edits through reverts the same articles (Yeghishe Arakyal Monastery, Amaras Monastery, Tsitsernavank Monastery, Gandzasar monastery, and almost only them) with the same (addressed) argument as Quzeyli (who's currently blocked). Sardur (talk) 12:13, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * Blocked and tagged. Tim Song (talk) 13:57, 3 June 2010 (UTC)