Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Qwaserty/Archive

16 April 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets

My apologies if this is improperly formatted. I tried to use the tool and everything disappeared. These named editors and the ip have been repeatedly making fundamentally the exact same non constructive edit on Taft School, adding puffery terms to the lede. See the history section at the article for details. Since it is all on one article, I have not given you diffs; the history tells the story.


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

John from Idegon (talk) 18:19, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I indef'd the accounts and blocked the IP for a month after stumbling across this from RfPP. Obviously CU practice is not to comment on the IP, but confirmation and a check for other accounts might be helpful. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  23:37, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:23, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Ponyo; is it reasoanble to infer from that that you found no other accounts connected to these three? HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  20:49, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Correct, there were only the three accounts.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:55, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Should this be filed under the IP as the sockmaster? It seems odd, though it has been active longer than the named accounts. I suggest archiving this under "Qwaserty" as the oldest named account. It just seems wrong to call an IP address a sockmaster. --  At am a  頭 23:20, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Moved. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:28, 19 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Already blocked (thanks HJ) now tagged. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:29, 19 April 2014 (UTC)