Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RUSTINGTON/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Proforma. The three socks are all SPAs with the same article interest, and are CU-confirmed to one another. The master is stale, but the connection is ducky plus BEANS stuff, I am confident they are all the same person. Girth Summit  (blether) 10:48, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocking and tagging.  Girth Summit  (blether)  10:50, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Newly-created account with a single edit (diff = https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Keen%2C_Baron_Keen_of_Elie&type=revision&diff=1104390710&oldid=1104233873) removing the same (accurate, reliably-sourced) content RUSTINGTON and their socks were entirely dedicated to removing. An example of one of RUSTINGTON's socks removing the same content, with the same (flawed) rationale stated almost word-for-word can be seen here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Keen%2C_Baron_Keen_of_Elie&type=revision&diff=1103330556&oldid=1101535804. This new account was created the same day RUSTINGTON and their socks were banned.

Further examples of RUSTONGTON's socks removing this content: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Keen%2C_Baron_Keen_of_Elie&type=revision&diff=1094183232&oldid=1093602776 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Keen%2C_Baron_Keen_of_Elie&type=revision&diff=1092931635&oldid=1092918535 Brattice (talk) 20:28, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * firefly ( t · c ) 20:39, 14 August 2022 (UTC)