Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rabt man/Archive

25 September 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

has already run a CU on this once and blocked, , and. The first account wasn't active at that time, but the behavior is very similar to the other socks -- on Saint Thomas Christians which all socks and master have edited, on Talk:Nair which also all socks and master have frequented -- same POV. The second account was stale then, but could actually turn out to be the real master --, as the pork thing seems to be a very common link for the accounts. The second account hasn't gone back to the topic now though is active on other stuff (a few edits), but it's a strong behavior link. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  18:16, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * is a ✅ sock of and has been blocked and tagged. They are ❌ to .  appears technically ❌.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  21:09, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Nair caste vandal using wikipedia for vandalism and sock puppetry. 117.222.163.68 (talk) 06:40, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

It is clear that this user is the same old master sock. The rebtman user has been blocked in the past but will definitely be back in the new account years later. He was stopped after being promoted by Nair in the past. It is also clear that he is the one who used many sock accounts. Outlander is a Nair caste promotion conducted by wikipedia. In the past, rebtman user Nair pages have been extensively edited and other caste pages such as sanit thomas christian, nadar and thiyya pages have been vandalized. But now the outlander user sees the same method and has destroyed the same pages. He has now become 3000 edit. When he started his wikipedia account, Nair was arguing about the first edit as a person. rebt man user Nair has previously tried to argue and claim that he is a Kshatriya. But the outlander similarly argued Nair as Kshatriya and can be seen here and rebtman did the same here. A good wikipedia editor will never submit to any category. However, he did extensive editing and acquired the rights to wikipedia and used it illegally for wikipedia. He is now editing more and trying to buy more wikipedia privileges. It is clear that he is the watchman of Nair pages like thirumulpad, panicker, kiriyathil nair, zamorin, etc. He is now the custodian of Nair related pages and is currently editing. Destroying other pages and advocating for the Nair caste is his regular occupation.

oulkander07 contributions clearly that this is the sock of rabtman:                 

Rabt man :

  

rebtman and outlander07 both destroy the page in the same way:

 

All of the above evidence points to the fact that he's editing or revert reviewing Nair pages, and he's mainly focused on Nair related, and it's interesting that he uses wikipedia power to do this. Below is an underline that the rebtman user did the same edit. He needs to be stopped as soon as possible 10 edit After editing other pages, a Nair edits a related page so that you can wear the face of decency and not feel suspicious .....

This may be the same person who gave the block in the past. He has a better chance of coming to the new account. This is because all the pages that have been edited by the old user have been edited by the outlander user, and not only the same edit method, but the old ip may not be the current ip account. The destruction of both is the same..so both are the same person — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.222.163.68 (talk) 11:06, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * See also the duplicate SPI at Sockpuppet investigations/Outlander07.
 * The IPV6 has no enwiki contributions, and only 4 edits to commons attempting to have a number of files deleted for copyvio. There is no crossover on any pages with the other users (I do note a comment by another IPV6 from the same /36 at this discussion, however /36 is still a big range, and the comments appear different). Therefore, I think they can be safely disregarded.
 * 137.xx has a single commons contribution, also advocating for the deletion of a file for copyvio. This file does not crossover with any of the other editors, and the deletion rationale differs from the other editors. Therefore, I cannot draw a link and I think they can be safely disregarded.
 * 157.xx has a single enwiki contribution to Talk:Kalaripayattu, where they identify another IP as a sock and comment on sources . Notably, Outlander had also commented in this section, however discussed different sources to 157.xx, and their method of citation and comment seemed to differ. Therefore, I cannot draw a link between 157.xx and I think they can also be disregarded.
 * The question, therefore, is whether Outlander and Rabt are linked, and this will need to rely on behaviour given Rabt is stale. Acknowledging that there is a fair bit of crossover in pages edited, separated by time (Rabt last edited in 2016 and Outlander was created in 2020), their edit summaries seem to differ quite a bit (e.g. ) as do their edits themselves (e.g., , and  provide the best examples). In summary, I'm not seeing enough to link any of these accounts to any of the others, aside from editing in a similar (and highly contentious) area, and therefore unless the reporting user can provide more proof than I've been able to locate, I think this can be closed without action. --Jack Frost (talk) 08:56, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Please do not close the case you should check each and every edit I had made. I can show as many grimy comments and edits from the ethnic vandal who himself requested the Investigation, even make requests to some senior editors to remove the ECP protection or to add content to the Nair page. There are caste vandals like Adithya Kiran and his team along with are targeting me because of reverting and reporting their POV works. You can find the comments from the sockpuppet of admitting that he had targetted me on my talk page. R.C Outlander07@talk 11:22, 30 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The below is manually merged from Sockpuppet investigations/Outlander07. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:26, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

No, the rabt man account is old and ips given are newly used, so when given under old 2016 rabt man account these ip and outlander07 id wont be catching as a sock.These ips are used by Outlander07 account in logged out editing mode for vandalisation, and in turn edit pattern and edit history of rebt man matches with outlander. If i add these ips under old 2016 account, these wont be catching as this is the new ip.

Outlander07 is Rebtman, a blocked user. Outlander07 in turn using the above mentioned ips as sock for logged out editing, this is the relationship

Please endorse the check user investigation against me as the ethnic sockpuppet is trying his level best to block me by accusing me of a Nair vandal. Yes, I do try to protect caste-related articles from people like you. Lol, I don't know what is wrong with this guy, see the diff's he posted above. R.C Outlander07@talk 10:57, 30 July 2021 (UTC)


 * I think the IP in question should be checked, because all I can see is massive disruption, and possibly casting aspersions. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 11:28, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IP: STOP. You have been copy-pasting dozens of edits to two SPIs simultaneously, which fragments the case and clogs up various monitoring feeds. Pick one case, tell me which one it is, and stick to that one. Thanks. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:14, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Actually, I'll make the choice for you. I'm keeping this one, merging and removing the other. Outlander signed up years after Rabt man's block expired, so there cannot be abusive sockpuppetry between those two. This leaves us with a single, very old enwiki IP edit to compare, and I'm not spending time on that because even if it was logged-out editing, a single instance of it can easily be explained as mere coincidence. We're done here. Closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:26, 30 July 2021 (UTC)