Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rachelksilber/Archive

07 May 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Rachelksilber created article Adrian Lang, and all 5 of these accounts were created afterwards, have very few edits, and have all voted to keep this article at Articles for deletion/Adrian Lang. Seems suspicious to me, and am sure there's some sockpuppetry involved. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:52, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Can you please disclose your evidence that Lawyergal is a sock-puppet of mine? I would freely admit it if (s)he was but do not know who it is. How have you determined this? I think it could be one of my colleagues. I also do not know Canadian Legal Eagle, though I am still checking to see if (s)he is a colleague of mine as well.Rachelksilber (talk) 15:22, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I've just determined that it is a colleague of mine - who certainly had no intention of doing my bidding on Wikipedia (and, in fact, commented without my knowledge). I imagine she just wanted to protest the deletion of Ms. Lang's entry, not realizing the red flag it would create since her IP address would be the same as mine. I hope this will not prejudice the entry.Rachelksilber (talk) 17:32, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  18:56, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Rachelksilber and Lawyergal are ✅. Canadian Legal Eagle is a to  match as well.
 * TOJenX, Fergus19, and ProudCanadian2000 are in the same geographic area as the other accounts, but the CU results are . ​—DoRD (talk)​ 17:31, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * No, I cannot, but the CheckUser tool sees your account and Lawyergal as being technically indistinguishable from each other. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 17:19, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 72 hours block for the master and indeffing the rest of the lot. I find Rachelksilber's excuses as lacking in credibility. Closing.