Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RadyoUkay819/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

According to the general stats of RadyoUkay819 and the general stats of LamChiong20 says that both accounts were created at the same day and same hour and just a few minutes after the other one was created. Both accounts did unsourced edits and I gave LamChiong20 two warnings (General note and caution) while I gave RadyoUkay819 one caution which is the second level warning since the user was doing a lot of unsourced edits so I want an investigation. For Dxoc1494 and Wildfm985, I suspected that it is also a sock puppet of RadyoUkay819 since the four user pages have the same format as well. Triila73 (talk) 07:36, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:04, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

As I said on the previous report, According to the general stats of RadyoUkay819 and the general stats of LamChiong20 says that both accounts were created at the same day and same hour and just a few minutes after the other one was created. Both accounts did unsourced edits and I gave LamChiong20 two warnings (General note and caution) while I gave RadyoUkay819 one caution which is the second level warning since the user was doing a lot of unsourced edits so I want an investigation. For Dxoc1494 and Wildfm985, I suspected that it is also a sock puppet of RadyoUkay819 since the four user pages have the same format as well.

NOTE: RadyoUkay819, Wildfm985, Lamchiong20 and Dxoc1494 has been blocked BUT THERE ARE TWO MORE ACCOUNTS THAT IT MIGHT BE A SOCK OF RADYOUKAY819 AS WELL THAT IS YET TO BE BLOCKED

So the four accounts are blocked ''UNTIL I saw two more socks, Healing2019 and CottonSwabs100. It's also the same thing that the first four blocked accounts, always on a minor edit mode. Same user page format and more.''

The two accounts have to be blocked before the unsourced edits from the person. Triila73 (talk) 10:03, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:55, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same evidence as the recent investigations. Please do NOT delete the articles that the sock puppets have created. I'll handle it. Triila73 (talk) 05:13, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:14, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same evidence with the first batch of investigations. All three accounts have the same user page format and all use minor edit mode. Triila73 (talk) 01:04, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * These will have to go to a seperate report because they are not related to the other accounts. I'll wait for more time to pass by and keeping an eye on more socks Triila73 (talk) 10:09, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * If possible, it might be worth cross-checking Sockpuppet investigations/Colombiabeauty Sockpuppet investigations/AnnLivinova, another sockfarm specializing in beauty contests. Bri.public (talk) 16:37, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Please include diffs comparing each sock's edits with edits made by a previous confirmed sock, or the master, for faster processing. As you can see, WP:SPI is badly backlogged and admins unfamiliar with this case are likely to skip over it without clear evidence. ST47 (talk) 22:24, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
 * A week later and no further info...guess this will have to wait for CU. Based on usernames and subject matter alone, I'm wondering why, , and aren't in this report as well. ST47 (talk) 19:22, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The three in the original report all intersect at Sofia Trimarco and Ella Cristofani among other articles. But they also all independently intersect the previously identified sockfarm:
 * MissCDO2019 intersects CU-blocked GreenCross2019 at Dayana Davtyan and Paola Chacón
 * Bayer2019 and MissCDO2019 both intersect GreenCross2019 at Miss Nicaragua 2019
 * Kiyome2019 and MissCDO2019 both intersect GreenCross2019 at Mehr Eliezer
 * That seems like enough to block on behavior among themselves. But I'm holding off for a moment because I agree there is also some evidence of other accounts' involvement (Jillian2006 and Mache2007 intersect at Miss Universe 2019 with the same name-pattern, and also also intersects with several. The more eyes look here, the more accounts we seem to find. CU would help nail this all down. DMacks (talk) 16:04, 16 September 2019 (UTC)


 * . This case and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AnnLivinova are ❌.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:51, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ✅, blocked and tagged:
 * The following accounts are ❌ to anyone:
 * I think you should leave identifying socks in this case to the filer who knows precisely what they are doing. I wouldn't have even run the checks against the users you identified except there was a reasonable possibility that some might be related to each other, but they aren't. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:19, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * No worries. I came her from a COIN request, where evidence was requested, so all I did was look for evidence. This genre's sock-drawers are not in my bureau. DMacks (talk) 17:45, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ❌ to anyone:
 * I think you should leave identifying socks in this case to the filer who knows precisely what they are doing. I wouldn't have even run the checks against the users you identified except there was a reasonable possibility that some might be related to each other, but they aren't. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:19, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * No worries. I came her from a COIN request, where evidence was requested, so all I did was look for evidence. This genre's sock-drawers are not in my bureau. DMacks (talk) 17:45, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I think you should leave identifying socks in this case to the filer who knows precisely what they are doing. I wouldn't have even run the checks against the users you identified except there was a reasonable possibility that some might be related to each other, but they aren't. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:19, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * No worries. I came her from a COIN request, where evidence was requested, so all I did was look for evidence. This genre's sock-drawers are not in my bureau. DMacks (talk) 17:45, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I think you should leave identifying socks in this case to the filer who knows precisely what they are doing. I wouldn't have even run the checks against the users you identified except there was a reasonable possibility that some might be related to each other, but they aren't. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:19, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * No worries. I came her from a COIN request, where evidence was requested, so all I did was look for evidence. This genre's sock-drawers are not in my bureau. DMacks (talk) 17:45, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * No worries. I came her from a COIN request, where evidence was requested, so all I did was look for evidence. This genre's sock-drawers are not in my bureau. DMacks (talk) 17:45, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

With the recent investigations, almost had the same evidence. The username ends with "2019" and the userpage has the same format with the other accounts before the other accounts have been blocked. Also has the same editing methods compared to the recent investigations. Triila73 (talk) 00:33, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Unitech2019 and —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 03:52, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Cabayi (talk) 06:37, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same userpage format as other accounts, same editing methods as well. Triila73 (talk) 05:29, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 05:47, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Cabayi (talk) 06:38, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same editing methods, same user page format, same username style (because the username ends with a number like other socks of RadyoUkay819) Triila73 (talk) 09:33, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . GABgab 14:33, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same editing methods, same user page format, same contributions. Also same username pattern (ends with a number on the username like other sock accounts) '''Is it possible that there are other accounts that I didn't spotted that are also related to RadyoUkay819? Please check.'''

Triila73 (talk) 15:39, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 17:14, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Opening for possible WP:DUCK concerning SPAs on a handful of 2018–2019 beauty pageant competitions. This will either be completed with evidence, or withdrawn within 24 hours. Bri.public (talk) 20:31, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry do not have time to complete analysis. Consider the 30 September inquiry withdrawn. Bri.public (talk) 16:06, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same userpage format, same editing methods, same username pattern (ends with a number), also related to beauty pageants. IS IT POSSIBLE THAT THERE ARE OTHER SOCK ACCOUNTS THAT I DIDN'T SPOTTED? Triila73 (talk) 11:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

The account has made only 4 mainspace edits, but Special:Permalink/900221217 and Special:Permalink/919158549 do look awfully similar. And the use of a properly formatted template and &lt;blockquote> as one's very first two edits, followed by template editing as their third , is unusual for a new user to say the least. - Bri.public (talk) 17:03, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:16, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same editing methods, same user page format, same username pattern (ends with number). Triila73 (talk) 10:28, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 14:46, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Duck-like adding selves to same project as first edit after registration, similar userpages created as second edit, editing same articles generally. In this case, one starts editing less than an hour after the other creates.

Per WP:BEANS not saying why but the SPI staff will recognize Sockpuppet investigations/RadyoUkay819.

There may be others currently active, specifically one who appears to have lifted the contents of user sandbox, then the other finds and edits soon after. Requesting CU for a sweep.

Odd IP edits look like logged-out editing but geolocation is inconsistent. Proxies? ☆ Bri (talk) 05:22, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * A proxy may have operated at 152.32.109.37, see ☆ Bri (talk) 20:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Colocation webhost proxy has been confirmed by another editor at 202.65.154.182, may be same group given proximity of edits like but it is not crystal clear. However, the use of a somewhat sophisticated subterfuge makes related editing all the more suspicious.☆ Bri (talk) 20:04, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Dyhp612 sockfarm looks like the same habitual behavior, e.g., note also four accounts named Dx  in confirmed socks.  do you agree? If so this is a 2017 LTA. ☆ Bri (talk) 05:53, 1 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Have added another user due to implausible history at Miss Finland 2020/Miss Finland when considering this sockfarm's history.


 * Miss Finland 2020  Dxma929 creates
 * Miss Finland  Dermawand2020  adds first inlink
 * Miss Finland 2020  Dermawand2020 edits
 * Miss Finland 2020  Leila1990  begins editing


 * In other words, editing a new article less than 20 minutes after its creation by a sockfarm, and only 8 minutes after its first inlink is added by the same sockfarm – fishy. ☆ Bri (talk) 01:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Continued socking since report was filed: September 3 article creation and rapid editing by sock  and associated PHL IP . ☆ Bri (talk) 16:36, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Even more continued socking, 5 September creation and editing by sock seven minutes later ☆ Bri (talk) 20:08, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Leila1990 is not blocked or tagged. Did you forget to block/tag? - Bri.public (talk) 22:29, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , They look blocked to me. Are you not seeing the same? -- RoySmith (talk) 22:38, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * You are right; sorry, I must have been looking at another account and/or don't have the blocked users strikethrough setting on my alt account - Bri.public (talk) 22:51, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , I think there's been some systemic issues today which has been causing scripts like the block-strikeout gadget to intermittently fail. No worries, and thanks for the heads up. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:09, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Dxma929 is ✅ to Dermawand2020 which are RadyoUkay819. Leila1990 looks technically related to Sockpuppet investigations/DevilBlack69 and to RadyoUkay819 but I can't rule out proxies.  - . I've CU blocked Dxma929 & Dermawand2020. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:15, 6 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Leila1990 as a suspected sock of RadyoUkay819. Their editing history screams out "I'm not a new user", and there's some behavioral aspects (beyond just the obsession with Miss Universe) that make me think Radyo is more likely than DevilBlack69. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:38, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Of the IPs, 119.95.189.12 is the only one which looks to still be active, and based on the contribution history is long-term static with no collateral activity. Blocked for 3 months.  Closing. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

A few days after the latest known sock in this sockfarm is blocked (9/14 ), this account is created (9/19 ), and almost immediately starts editing the same article that the sockfarm is the #3 top editor on. Additional similarities in username construction are apparent. A quick CU look-see is requested in light of prolific socking in this entire space (see Conflict of interest noticeboard). Bri.public (talk) 15:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This account is technically related to, so the sockmaster is . I'll block and tag, but can this please be moved to Sockpuppet investigations/RadyoUkay819?--  Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:07, 23 September 2020 (UTC)


 * moved. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 16:20, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Nothing left to do. Close. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 16:26, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( originally filed under this user)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Reading the editor interaction carefully shows that these two accounts have been tag-teaming Miss Universe articles in a way that implies either meat- or sockpuppetry. Asking for CU since this area is wholly rife with sockfarms; see conflict of interest noticeboard for a run-down.

The tag-teaming is most plain in their articles that appear first in the editor interaction tool (sorted by min time between edits) as follows. The bulleted item is when they switched off, i.e. the first edit of a new account on a particular article. Full diffs are only listed for Miss Universe 2012 due to tedium; they can be followed in their entirety through the tool if necessary.


 * Miss_Universe_2012
 * 03 August 2020 Felipevmvillalobos
 * 04 August 2020 KellyKelly2013
 * 09 August 2020 Felipevmvillalobos
 * 14 August 2020 KellyKelly2013


 * Miss_Universe_2013
 * 03 August 2020 Felipevmvillalobos
 * 04 August 2020 KellyKelly2013
 * 09 August 2020 Felipevmvillalobos
 * 14 August 2020 KellyKelly2013


 * Miss_Universe_2016
 * 02 August 2020 Felipevmvillalobos
 * 08 August 2020 KellyKelly2013
 * 09 August 2020 Felipevmvillalobos
 * 17 August 2020 KellyKelly2013


 * Miss_Universe_2018
 * 03 August 2020 Felipevmvillalobos
 * 08 August 2020 KellyKelly2013
 * 09 August 2020 Felipevmvillalobos
 * 14 August 2020 KellyKelly2013
 * 19 August 2020 Felipevmvillalobos


 * Miss_Universe_2019
 * 03 August 2020 Felipevmvillalobos
 * 04 August 2020 KellyKelly2013
 * 05 August 2020 Felipevmvillalobos
 * 08 August 2020 KellyKelly2013
 * 09 August 2020 Felipevmvillalobos
 * 14 August 2020 KellyKelly2013
 * 19 August 2020 Felipevmvillalobos

In fact not only are they grooming the same sections of the same articles in the same manner, but they are following a virtual A/B schedule in doing so. Here's each account's activity on the articles listed above, by day.
 * Felipevmvillalobos, August 2020
 * 02 03   05    09       19
 * KellyKelly2013, August 2020
 * 04   08    14 17

Requesting checkuser cross-check against recently active beauty pageant sockfarms including DevilBlack69 and RadyoUkay819. Note that there's a CU confirmed KellyXxxx account in the sockfarm. ☆ Bri (talk) 02:54, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

One other thing I missed before; KellyKelly2013 was blocked for changing "United States" to USA in beauty queen articles; this is also a favored edit of Felipevmvillalobos. ☆ Bri (talk) 03:25, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

A note on user timecards. It looks like K and F may be on different continents. This is consistent with my statement at COIN concerning international coordination. I'll retain the CU request, though, in case of matches with the DevilBlack69]] and RadyoUkay819 sockfarms. ☆ Bri (talk) 04:15, 24 September 2020 (UTC)


 * ST47 I'm not sure if I'm allowed to do this; may I ask that the master's userpage be annotated as banned per WP:THREESTRIKES? ☆ Bri (talk) 01:00, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * KellyKelly2013 and Felipevmvillalobos are ❌. However, KellyKelly2013 are on the same range as blocked users User:KellyAvilla and User:Leila1990. ST47 (talk) 12:51, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Report moved from KellyKelly2013 to RadyoUkay819 —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 05:37, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

New account on their first edit restores the identical changes to the same article last edited a few days ago  by a blocked account in the RU sockfarm, then their subsequent editing is another one where multiple RU socks have been blocked. Naming convention, edit summary (not) habits, account name are all consistent with this sockfarm. And a striking preference for a particular fansite that this sockfarm has repeatedly introduced into beauty pageant articles.

Also note User:LexiLights in the DevilBlack69 sockfarm, which I believe is actually the same sockfarm as this one (I have requested a merge). ☆ Bri (talk) 14:19, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Group 1: the following accounts are ✅ to previously confirmed socks in this case:
 * Group 2: the following accounts are ✅ to Sockpuppet investigations/DevilBlack69 but ❌ to this case:
 * Please do not merge the cases. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:03, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Group 2: the following accounts are ✅ to Sockpuppet investigations/DevilBlack69 but ❌ to this case:
 * Please do not merge the cases. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:03, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Group 2: the following accounts are ✅ to Sockpuppet investigations/DevilBlack69 but ❌ to this case:
 * Please do not merge the cases. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:03, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Please do not merge the cases. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:03, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Please do not merge the cases. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:03, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Please do not merge the cases. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:03, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Simplewiki checkuser confirmed the link. Account exists here also and the user is a banned sockpuppet. --IWI (talk) 00:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I don't think it was documented on-wiki, but should be able to confirm this as the blocking CheckUser. --IWI (talk) 01:49, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I'll follow up with Oshwah privately.  Operator873 talk connect  04:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ImprovedWikiImprovment - Can you please provide a link to the CU case where this is confirmed? I'll just block the account without need for an en-wiki checkuser check...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   01:47, 9 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Dxlk is globally locked, so it's a fairly moot point. Nevertheless, tagged them as proven after I verified with Operator873 that this was in fact a RadyoUkay sock. GeneralNotability (talk) 02:12, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)

Unusual appearance together at drafts and out of the way articles, including notably the master account moving a draft to main space a few minutes after the suspected sock made their last edit here and here. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:33, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * New evidence: both are beauty pageant SPAs and one blanked the sockpuppet tag on the RadyoUkay819 sockmaster page (a pageant LTA). If I had seen that before, I would have opened this SPI as a continuation of Sockpuppet investigations/RadyoUkay819. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:38, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * These accounts are ✅ to one another. CU puts them in the same general geographic region, but a different country, to previous socks; however, there haven't been any checks for a couple of years now, and people do move. I'm blocking as confirmed to one another, and suspected to RadyoUkay819. Locks requested. Closing.  Girth Summit  (blether)  14:33, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
User page was created by another user account, which is a confirmed sockpuppet, and exactly matches the sock's user page. Wondering if this was missed by checkuser? ☆ Bri (talk) 16:26, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

I'm adding another user whose draft was moved to article space by a sockpuppet suspiciously soon after their last edit. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:55, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - those accounts are stale - CU data isn't stored indefinitely, so accounts with no recent activity aren't picked up by the tool. I think it's quite likely that these are further socks, but I'm not going to block them unless they reactivate and we have some data to compare against. Hope that makes sense, Girth Summit  (blether)  18:39, 28 March 2023 (UTC)