Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RahulChawla2907/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

At Talk:Surya_Siddhanta at 19:28, July 19, 2020‎ User:RahulChawla1990 said this: It still continues and I am so very serprised to see this. I ask the same question or similar perhaps, why can BC era dating exit on this page along with CE era. Which infact our own references and cited publications support. Updates made to Surya Siddhanta in CE and also in BC era. For exmaple Burges sfigured out CE era dating by working out updates made to longitudinal data. I think what is being done is the suppression of BC era dating and complete removal of scientific references from this page. At User_talk:Gurnidar at User talk:Gurnidar User:Gurnidar said: I completely second what you said. I went through the link you added on Lets discuss this in the sections. I need answer to why BC era dating cannot exits on Wikipedia (which infact is supported by several references and researches) along with the CE era dating. Even my references support CE era additions to Surya Siddhanta as it was mentioned in the original edits by @rahulchawla1990. The very similar content and language usage of these statements and the relative newness of the two accounts and the singular focus by both accounts on Indian Astronomy, especially Surya Siddhanta, give cause to concern that they are the same user. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:51, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * myself and Gurnidar are housemates. I do not have to share anymore personal information than this. I started the edits with good faith in wikipedia and provided heaps of references but i was being witch hunted by a team of users who were publicly communicating with each other remove my BC era dating of Surya Siddhanta wikipage which is out there in open. When I pointed this out they stopped making edits. I had already lost faith in wikipedia after all that but ny friend Gurnidar wouldnt let this go.--RahulChawla1990 (talk) 00:18, 20 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The potential group of editors/admins have removed our referenced sections on the dating of Surya Sidhanta without giving any proper reason. They keen on claiming that all of my references are unreliable including the journals published as Indian Journal of History of Science. They had been remoing references without even reviewing just based on the fact that they are BC era datings. One editor claims that no hand written manuscript has been found to BC era dating. This claim is funny because we can't expect all the manuscripts to survive over thousands of years do we? a flawed logic? Then one editor claiming that Indus Valley script is not really a script. another flawed self proclaimed idea. For which all the scientific authorities will disagree. As far as Surya Sidhanta is concerned, there are several observations which can pin point the time to when those observations were made. For example presence of Two pole stars one at each north pole and other at south pole. Now we can go to other wikipedia pages to see when that phenomena occurred at the earliest possible time in past when Thuban (3900–1800 BCE according to wikipedia) was north pole star and Achernar (3,400 BC according to wikipedia)was south pole star. These editors are not letting to add this data on this page. Other is the Obliquity of Earth's axis, which is recorded twice in Surya Siddhanta, one in chapter 2 and other in chapter 12. chapter 2 is 23.97 degree and chapter 12 is 24 degree exact. both of these are close but different number and belong to era between 2500 BCE to 3000 BCE. This can again be checked on google easily. These editors claim that these observations are wrong "period". I am wondering since when Wikipedians are peer reviewing the texts on ancient science?. They removed the two references of peer reviewed and published journals by Indian Journal of History of Science. I will raise an official complaint on the noticeboard to deal with these potential gangs of people who are removing scientific references of journals only because the empirical data and scientific evidence dates Surya Sidhanta to BC era. --Gurnidar (talk) 05:51, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Perhaps User:Harpreet1292 needs to be added to the mix. First edit as a supporting comment on the talk page seems highly suspicious -- Raziman T V (talk) 19:10, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 07:07, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
 * -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 07:07, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
 * -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 07:07, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
 * -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 07:07, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
 * -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 07:07, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
 * -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 07:07, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
 * -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 07:07, 25 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Case moved from RahulChawla1990 to RahulChawla2907. The SandDoctor  Talk 15:39, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * per the above. Closing. The SandDoctor  Talk 15:40, 26 July 2020 (UTC)