Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rainbowofpeace/Archive

02 January 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

I was struck by the discussion that takes up the top half of Template talk:Discrimination sidebar. It goes nowhere, and then at the end the above two accounts - no previous edits at all - jump in and agree with the most prolific contributor, and then jump out, never to edit again. Similar grammar, same tendency to capitalise "General", indeed same insistence on the use of the word "general". They use the exact same idiosyncratic signature style, and so are presumably related to each other; the main contributor also has problems with his signatures. The template itself is problematic but that's another issue. Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 17:34, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The following are ✅:


 * It is that the following is related to the above group:

Tiptoety talk 19:07, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked the confirmed sock and warned the master. I'm going to leave Dragonsread alone for now, as I'm not entirely convinced of it based on behavior (i.e. could be meatpuppeting) - and the account hasn't edited since the incident anyway. Feel free to relist if it becomes active again. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 19:12, 2 January 2011 (UTC)