Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rajesh of Raigad/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

All 3 accounts being used for editing same articles to evade WP:SCRUTINY. The opponents of this editor is getting the impression that these are different people. For example, an editor left a talk message on talk page of Ouṃkāra thinking that he is a new editor but Ouṃkāra has interacted with this person before as StephenPaa and also engaged in an edit war.


 * Same removal of "The story of Tajuddeen" section from Legend of Cheraman Perumals. (StephenPaa, Ouṃkāra)
 * Both adding about "Old Malayalam form of Hanjamana/Anjuman" on Jewish copper plates of Cochin. (Rajesh of Raigad, StephenPaa)
 * Created and later moved Venatu. (Rajesh of Raigad, Ouṃkāra)
 * Created and later moved Venat. (Rajesh of Raigad, Ouṃkāra)
 * Same mass content removal on Edakkal Caves. (StephenPaa, Ouṃkāra)
 * Table addition on Goda Ravi. (StephenPaa, Ouṃkāra)
 * Large reverts on Chera dynasty by terming opposing edits as "vandalism". (Rajesh of Raigad, StephenPaa)
 * Decapitalizing 'Battle' on Battle of Takkolam. (Rajesh of Raigad, Ouṃkāra)
 * Only 3 editors to ever add any content on Sthanu Ravi Varma.
 * Same symbol on userpage. (Rajesh of Raigad, Ouṃkāra) Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 09:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The three editing histories don't overlap, which we generally take to mean the user lost their password, or just wanted a new username. They're allowed to do that, as long as they're not doing it to, as noted, evade WP:SCRUTINY.  I've got an exceptionally large supply of WP:AGF today, so I'm going to just drop uw-agf-sock on their talk page and let it go at that. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:34, 20 February 2021 (UTC)