Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rajputro.nagaland/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Creates a new user and comments on the same article talk page immediately after the master is blocked. Similar ranting by the master here. Looks like a case of WP:DUCK. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:07, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. The two accounts are editing from the same geographical area. However, the suspected sock is using a proxy and a different device. There is also an earlier account which is ✅ to SylhetiEditor:. Rajputro.nagaland stopped editing just before SylhetiEditor began editing, and there were no warnings of misconduct on Rajputro.nagaland's Talk page. I'd like a determination as to whether SylhetiUser is a probable sock and to ping me either way. If blocks are going to be made, I prefer to make them myself.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:07, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * SylhetiEditor has admitted that SylhetiUser is their account. I have therefore blocked and tagged the three accounts. Please move the case to Rajputro.nagaland.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:05, 19 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Case moved from SylhetiEditor to Rajputro.nagaland. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 23:04, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Similar POV against the use of h term "Nagari" as can be seen and by a sock here. Interaction here Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:20, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅, obviously. . ST47 (talk) 18:10, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Disruptive edits and foul language. He is User:Rajputro.nagaland. See: here and here UserNumber (talk) 14:36, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - All accounts are now blocked. Itrans issues has been CU blocked after this report was created. Leaving for clerk to decide whether to just redirect or delete this case. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 22:29, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I would have deleted this page as a duplicate as only Itrans issues was not blocked when this report was created, but it might make sense to redirect instead. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 22:35, 1 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Merged. Closing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:22, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The account is an obvious WP:SPA and posting advocacy-type comments on talk pages. The user shows no interest outside Sylheti language and Sylheti Nagri and has recently been reactivated after three months to join a discussion on WT:WikiProject Linguistics about Sylheti language. The POV is identical to Rajputro and his socks,,.

Account was created in October 2019 but became active since February 2020 after Rajputro.nagaland got indeffed. Could be either a sleeper of Rajputro.nagaland or someone is trying to avoid WP:SCRUTINY. Requesting a sleeper check. Za-ari-masen (talk) 09:48, 22 October 2020 (UTC)


 * I get that all the Rajputro socks are stale at the moment but is it possible to run a sleeper check on Tuahtme to see if there is a different master behind this account with the same POV and overlapping interests? The way Tuahtme turns up after a three-month hiatus to join a discussion on a WikiProject talk page without being notified is quite fishy to be honest. Za-ari-masen (talk) 08:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I looked at the two diffs presented (Tuahtme vs Barksduane). The style of writing doesn't seem the same to me.  Also, all of the Rajputro socks created their original accounts on enwiki; Tuahtme was created on en.wiktionary.  I also don't see where it says Barksduane is a Rajputro sock.  Not tagged, not mentioned in the archives, and nothing about it in the log entry.   you made the block; do you remember?  My inclination is to decline the CU request and close with no action taken, but I'd like somebody else to give a second opinion.  -- RoySmith (talk) 23:53, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I can draw connections between SylhetiEditor and Barksduane through the CU log. Tuahtme is ❌ and no other apparent master. I barely ran this check, and could have easily declined it based on lack of evidence and WP:NOTFISHING. I suggest future case fillings include more evidence than just a similar POV accusation as two people can have the same point of view very easily. --  Amanda  (aka DQ) 20:10, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

ST47 (talk) 16:39, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅, . ST47 (talk) 16:39, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Same editing area - "Sylhet" related, including scripts and culture. Interaction here. Substantial 'Anti-Bengali' bias as can be seen  as well as in the confirmed socks   , including similar reverts to redirects  , with one with an edit summary "The page was vandalised by Bengali Muslim editors" , removed a map that included Sylheti as a dialect of Bengali per sources. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:47, 29 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Another newly created ID with obvious POV, adding commentary based on unreliable source(s) (online test) . Another newly created one was changing image description . - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:36, 29 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Aideppp restored unreliably sourced content added by LotifaChowdhury and others (possible contentious) changes/additions by AbdulHalim1995 and Hatxora. Pinging . - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:35, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - this is going to be tricky, as all the old socks seem to be stale, and I'm not seeing any notes on cuwiki. Let me see what I can see though.  Girth Summit  (blether)  10:16, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are all ✅ to one another:
 * I can't get any old CU data to compare against, so I will block the group, and tag as confirmed to নবদ্বীপ (the oldest of those accounts), and suspected to Rajputro.nagaland.  looks very different from this group; from a CU perspective, I'd say ❌.   Girth Summit  (blether)  10:33, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I can't get any old CU data to compare against, so I will block the group, and tag as confirmed to নবদ্বীপ (the oldest of those accounts), and suspected to Rajputro.nagaland.  looks very different from this group; from a CU perspective, I'd say ❌.   Girth Summit  (blether)  10:33, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I can't get any old CU data to compare against, so I will block the group, and tag as confirmed to নবদ্বীপ (the oldest of those accounts), and suspected to Rajputro.nagaland.  looks very different from this group; from a CU perspective, I'd say ❌.   Girth Summit  (blether)  10:33, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I can't get any old CU data to compare against, so I will block the group, and tag as confirmed to নবদ্বীপ (the oldest of those accounts), and suspected to Rajputro.nagaland.  looks very different from this group; from a CU perspective, I'd say ❌.   Girth Summit  (blether)  10:33, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I can't get any old CU data to compare against, so I will block the group, and tag as confirmed to নবদ্বীপ (the oldest of those accounts), and suspected to Rajputro.nagaland.  looks very different from this group; from a CU perspective, I'd say ❌.   Girth Summit  (blether)  10:33, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I can't get any old CU data to compare against, so I will block the group, and tag as confirmed to নবদ্বীপ (the oldest of those accounts), and suspected to Rajputro.nagaland.  looks very different from this group; from a CU perspective, I'd say ❌.   Girth Summit  (blether)  10:33, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I can't get any old CU data to compare against, so I will block the group, and tag as confirmed to নবদ্বীপ (the oldest of those accounts), and suspected to Rajputro.nagaland.  looks very different from this group; from a CU perspective, I'd say ❌.   Girth Summit  (blether)  10:33, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Same editing area, Sylhet-related and special interest in Citrus macroptera and its usage and geographical span. Interaction. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Everything in the archives is beyond . Blocked and tagged as suspected based on behavioural overlap. Closing.-- Ponyo bons mots 22:20, 5 April 2024 (UTC)