Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rameses/Archive

Evidence submitted by GoRight
This is an unusual request so I am unsure if this is where I should make it. Please see the discussion at, which will then lead you to. Note that the confirmation being relied upon was made by User:Raul654 who as we know had to relinquish his checkuser rights because it was determined that he had abused them. In the interests of fairness to the individual or individuals involved I would request that this determination be independently confirmed or rejected. --GoRight (talk) 02:31, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users

 * For the record, both accounts are already currently indefinitely blocked for WP:ADVOCACY and edit-warring, in addition to socking. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 18:36, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

CheckUser requests
Requested by GoRight (talk) 02:31, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

– Behavioral evidence clearly indicates that these two users are related. Furthermore, another admin has already blocked both accounts per WP:DUCK. In any case, no CU is necessary, here. MuZemike 03:02, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Conclusions
I believe nobody else is going to discuss, so I'm marking as closed. MuZemike 02:21, 15 December 2009 (UTC)