Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RandalDavid/Archive

10 February 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

On 3 February I blocked the master and first three socks as blatant socks promoting skincare products on their userpages. Today Johnxtyee was created and created a spammy page on Johnxeaux's user page. Please check if there are as yet undiscovered accounts in this spam network. BethNaught (talk) 08:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Sleepers check needed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  10:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The spam is far more wide-ranging than skin care and medical products.
 * With the exception of three accounts, all the accounts were already blocked. I blocked the three accounts.
 * Group 1 – the following acounts are ✅ to each other:
 * Group 2 – the following acounts are ✅ to each other and to Group 1:
 * I've tagged no accounts. The SPI needs to be moved to the oldest account (created sometime in November), although I strongly suspect there are older accounts but beyond the 90-day limit of CU data. If any tagging is to be done, I recommend they all be tagged as one master.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Moved to the oldest account. All tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 2 – the following acounts are ✅ to each other and to Group 1:
 * I've tagged no accounts. The SPI needs to be moved to the oldest account (created sometime in November), although I strongly suspect there are older accounts but beyond the 90-day limit of CU data. If any tagging is to be done, I recommend they all be tagged as one master.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Moved to the oldest account. All tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 2 – the following acounts are ✅ to each other and to Group 1:
 * I've tagged no accounts. The SPI needs to be moved to the oldest account (created sometime in November), although I strongly suspect there are older accounts but beyond the 90-day limit of CU data. If any tagging is to be done, I recommend they all be tagged as one master.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Moved to the oldest account. All tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 2 – the following acounts are ✅ to each other and to Group 1:
 * I've tagged no accounts. The SPI needs to be moved to the oldest account (created sometime in November), although I strongly suspect there are older accounts but beyond the 90-day limit of CU data. If any tagging is to be done, I recommend they all be tagged as one master.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Moved to the oldest account. All tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 2 – the following acounts are ✅ to each other and to Group 1:
 * I've tagged no accounts. The SPI needs to be moved to the oldest account (created sometime in November), although I strongly suspect there are older accounts but beyond the 90-day limit of CU data. If any tagging is to be done, I recommend they all be tagged as one master.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Moved to the oldest account. All tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 2 – the following acounts are ✅ to each other and to Group 1:
 * I've tagged no accounts. The SPI needs to be moved to the oldest account (created sometime in November), although I strongly suspect there are older accounts but beyond the 90-day limit of CU data. If any tagging is to be done, I recommend they all be tagged as one master.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Moved to the oldest account. All tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 2 – the following acounts are ✅ to each other and to Group 1:
 * I've tagged no accounts. The SPI needs to be moved to the oldest account (created sometime in November), although I strongly suspect there are older accounts but beyond the 90-day limit of CU data. If any tagging is to be done, I recommend they all be tagged as one master.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Moved to the oldest account. All tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 2 – the following acounts are ✅ to each other and to Group 1:
 * I've tagged no accounts. The SPI needs to be moved to the oldest account (created sometime in November), although I strongly suspect there are older accounts but beyond the 90-day limit of CU data. If any tagging is to be done, I recommend they all be tagged as one master.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Moved to the oldest account. All tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 2 – the following acounts are ✅ to each other and to Group 1:
 * I've tagged no accounts. The SPI needs to be moved to the oldest account (created sometime in November), although I strongly suspect there are older accounts but beyond the 90-day limit of CU data. If any tagging is to be done, I recommend they all be tagged as one master.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Moved to the oldest account. All tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 2 – the following acounts are ✅ to each other and to Group 1:
 * I've tagged no accounts. The SPI needs to be moved to the oldest account (created sometime in November), although I strongly suspect there are older accounts but beyond the 90-day limit of CU data. If any tagging is to be done, I recommend they all be tagged as one master.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Moved to the oldest account. All tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 2 – the following acounts are ✅ to each other and to Group 1:
 * I've tagged no accounts. The SPI needs to be moved to the oldest account (created sometime in November), although I strongly suspect there are older accounts but beyond the 90-day limit of CU data. If any tagging is to be done, I recommend they all be tagged as one master.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Moved to the oldest account. All tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 2 – the following acounts are ✅ to each other and to Group 1:
 * I've tagged no accounts. The SPI needs to be moved to the oldest account (created sometime in November), although I strongly suspect there are older accounts but beyond the 90-day limit of CU data. If any tagging is to be done, I recommend they all be tagged as one master.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Moved to the oldest account. All tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I've tagged no accounts. The SPI needs to be moved to the oldest account (created sometime in November), although I strongly suspect there are older accounts but beyond the 90-day limit of CU data. If any tagging is to be done, I recommend they all be tagged as one master.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Moved to the oldest account. All tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I've tagged no accounts. The SPI needs to be moved to the oldest account (created sometime in November), although I strongly suspect there are older accounts but beyond the 90-day limit of CU data. If any tagging is to be done, I recommend they all be tagged as one master.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Moved to the oldest account. All tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I've tagged no accounts. The SPI needs to be moved to the oldest account (created sometime in November), although I strongly suspect there are older accounts but beyond the 90-day limit of CU data. If any tagging is to be done, I recommend they all be tagged as one master.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Moved to the oldest account. All tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I've tagged no accounts. The SPI needs to be moved to the oldest account (created sometime in November), although I strongly suspect there are older accounts but beyond the 90-day limit of CU data. If any tagging is to be done, I recommend they all be tagged as one master.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Moved to the oldest account. All tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I've tagged no accounts. The SPI needs to be moved to the oldest account (created sometime in November), although I strongly suspect there are older accounts but beyond the 90-day limit of CU data. If any tagging is to be done, I recommend they all be tagged as one master.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Moved to the oldest account. All tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I've tagged no accounts. The SPI needs to be moved to the oldest account (created sometime in November), although I strongly suspect there are older accounts but beyond the 90-day limit of CU data. If any tagging is to be done, I recommend they all be tagged as one master.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Moved to the oldest account. All tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Moved to the oldest account. All tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)