Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Random Haste/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Similar edits like the master. Adding new destinations, same kind of edit summaries. The entire set of contributions need to be checked to establish the similarity.

WHat "{igtczq1 &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 17:43, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . - Please compare the accounts. --Jack Frost (talk) 20:09, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
 * ...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:59, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Technical evidence:
 * . The users both edit from the same (somewhat-wide) IP range registered to an ASN, but where the ISP has a much wider range registered. They both use different user agents, and have never crossed the same IP address in the range.
 * Behavioral evidence:
 * What convinces me that these two accounts belong to the same user are based off of the similar articles and edit summary usage between them. Looking at the editor interaction analyzer shows that these two users both have the same interest with articles about airports. If you look at the timeline for their edits to the Chennai International Airport article (link is here), you'll see that both these users use the exact same edit summary, "Booking engines aren't reliable". This (and others) span across the articles that they've both edited.
 * Conclusion:
 * I am blocking this account as a sock puppet of the master, and tagging the account as well. Closing this SPI...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   01:45, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Similar edits again. This account was created on 19th September. They also started editing the same day. Wonder how such a new account is able to determine the validity of destinations added in airports. Also, note, there is little to no edits outside of airport articles in the master and another sock blocked recently &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 09:05, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * OUT TO JUPITAR is . There's a lot of overlap of relatively small IP ranges, but nothing else matches.   -- RoySmith (talk) 17:15, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * - Article overlap, focus on the same sections, timing of previous blocks and signup, timecards, edit summaries , and the mix between wikieditor and mobile edits, seem enough evidence to me. Please, block OUT TO JUPITAR. Thank you. MarioGom (talk) 22:19, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * firefly ( t · c ) 12:13, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Similar interests as the master and previous socks. Edit summaries are also very similar to what the master used on and off during their time. Requesting a CU to check and if possible have a range block. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 18:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Exceedingly likely; blocking, taggins as proven. I don't see anyone that is obviously them.  Girth Summit  (blether)  14:37, 25 February 2023 (UTC)