Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Randomdragonpakistan/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Recreation of article Aneesa Sharif using very similar text as the version created by Randomdragonpakistan. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:30, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * To add to the behavioural evidence, the deleted version of this article contained the sentence "She has modelled for fashion shows in Pakistan, United Kingdom and Dubai and is also known for being among the few British Asian models to be featured on Vogue", and the current version "...has also been modelling for fashion shows in Pakistan, the United Kingdom and Dubai. She is also known for being among the few British Asian models to be featured on Vogue". Both editors have edited Fire Records (Pakistan). Cordless Larry (talk) 07:34, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Can I request it here? if yes then I have to tell the person who opened this report. first of all he is having 100 percent misunderstanding, I got the text from this URL, I copied the information from there https://en.everybodywiki.com/Aneesa_Sharif to here by changing words. I'm not using any other accounts. All admins are welcome to check my IPs. I am here to create articles and not for paid editing. The person who has made this complaint here because of one of my recent edits which he thought I was doing for promotional purposes, and since then he is on me, this comes under personal attack, he made two of my articles for deleting which i created through these sections and it was approved by the editors and administrators. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_United_States/Requested_Articles

I hope administrators will check and give the proper solution to this :)

--Static Hash (talk) 14:11, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

I also want to tell admins that the person he has mentioned has nothing to do with me or I have nothing to do with him, There is a 100 percent misunderstanding with the administrator because i copied the material from https://en.everybodywiki.com/Aneesa_Sharif this link. I know the Wikipedia policy and I am here to create articles and edit and here to respect people, I had no idea that my one edit will make this impact on my username.

--Static Hash (talk) 14:17, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , Separate from any other issues, by copying the text from everybodywiki without proper attribution, you violated the CC BY-SA 3.0 license under which it was published. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:20, 29 March 2021 (UTC)


 * But I didn't copy the whole text, I just copied a few lines and the rest changed it from my own. If that was a mistake then the administrator should have notified me instead of posting the sock puppet report, let me say you're right so who will notify me if i copied it from there? Of course the administrator they can warn me but he just said i am using multiple accounts while I have one here, anyway administrators are welcome to check all the IP addresses and whatever it may take. I am not him, I am me and I am using one account here. He just nominated two of my pages for deletion. Teddy_Dief and Danny_Dean other admins and editors were working on the page so how come it was not passing the notability of Wikipedia? I am seriously confused, those two articles were requested by the editors in the section and I just created them, the admins and editors approved the page and today both have deletion tags by the person who opened this report wow thank you so much, I spend 13 days on that page creating it.

--Static Hash (talk) 14:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , What does " those two articles were requested by the editors in the section" mean? -- RoySmith (talk) 15:17, 29 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Those two articles were nominated for deletion by the same person who opened this report so i am thinking it is because he thinks that i am doing paid editing but i have clarified already that these articles were requested by editors in the Wikipedia article for creation section, according to that person who opened this report he said the article is not notable so I asked him if it was not notable are the other editors and administrator did not checked it before approving? 5 editors who were 14 years old at Wikipedia were editing the article with me which i created so if it was not notable it would have been deleted by them then why are those two articles nominated for AFD after i created a page for Aneesa Sharif which was deleted already, is it Wikipedia policy that if the one page is deleted it can't be re created with fresh articles? If yes, I am at fault, if not then kindly check the logs on that page, I re created the page, the previous article had 5 to 6 references and in the new article i added 10+ references. I am disappointed btw one of my edits makes that person think i am using Wikipedia for paid editing or may use another account but they are all assumptions. Any editor or Administrator can investigate this. Thanks and have a good day.

--Static Hash (talk) 20:28, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , How many user names have you had? I've already found CGOV and I am Kamal.  Are there more? -- RoySmith (talk) 18:14, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi : that are my same username which i changed it to Static Hash, first I had CGOV and i renamed it to IamKamal and then I have renamed it to Static Hash. I don't think that username changing is prohibited or is it?

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Alleged master is . GABgab 19:05, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't have time to dig into this now, but I will note that both of these accounts have done name changes. I am Kamal → Static Hash, and Turyalazamkhan → Randomdragonpakistan. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:36, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I keep coming back to look at this, and keep coming to the same conclusion. It's possible that Randomdragonpakistan and Static Hash are socks, but I'm not seeing enough conclusive evidence to justify a block.  There may well be UPE going on, with both editors working from the same notes, but I'll leave that to somebody else to sort out.  Closing with no action taken. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:02, 1 April 2021 (UTC)