Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rannulz2000/Archive

12 September 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Per these edits to the same article (here, and here). Both copyvios, on the same article, almost 100% the same content, and with the same edit summary.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   20:42, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * I was also making a report, though User:Oshwah made the case much more concisely. If curious, here is a link to what I had written, though, frankly, I probably wouldn't waste my time reading it :) Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 20:49, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Both are likely, wating for CU.  RMS52  Talk to me  17:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - to compare the two (diffs provided above).  Vanjagenije  (talk)  16:36, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The two accounts are ✅. Both accounts blocked and tagged. I don't believe the puppet's statement at Apparition11's Talk page that they are separate people, but even if true, it doesn't change that everything "they" are doing is contrary to policy. I see nothing constructive about the contributions (copyright violations, promotion, COI). Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)